M42 Fonts on signs / Conviction

HPJ888
HPJ888 Posts: 10 Forumite
Hi

This relates to the recent news that the signs on the M42 have been using the incorrect font and therefore any convictions could be seen as unlawful. I cannot post the link here as I am a new user, however a quick look online and you will find it.

I was caught by a camera on M42 (the junctions where the wrong fonts are) in April 2012 had to appear in Court. I was awarded 6 points and a fine of roughly £550.

What are people's thoughts? Would I have a case to get my conviction squashed? If so, how should I proceed?

Thanks

HPJ
«13

Comments

  • Which court did you attend, Nuneaton or Coventry?
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,193 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You will find more information on this issue here;-

    http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showforum=5
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • HPJ888
    HPJ888 Posts: 10 Forumite
    Hi

    Royal Lemington Spa. Through Warwickshire Police. Offence location was M42/M6 Toll, Junc 9-7, Gantry 6514B / 1165B, MP 41/4 Southbound

    Thanks
  • HPJ888
    HPJ888 Posts: 10 Forumite
    Thanks Kingstreet I'll take a look
  • HPJ888 wrote: »
    Hi

    Royal Lemington Spa. Through Warwickshire Police. Offence location was M42/M6 Toll, Junc 9-7, Gantry 6514B / 1165B, MP 41/4 Southbound

    Thanks

    01926415000 ask for the central ticket office and ask their advice. Since 11,000 are wrong you won't be the first. You may have to go back to court tho.
  • HPJ888
    HPJ888 Posts: 10 Forumite
    01926415000 ask for the central ticket office and ask their advice. Since 11,000 are wrong you won't be the first. You may have to go back to court tho.

    What do you mean 11,000 are wrong? As in they were wrongfully convicted, or they were wrong to try to get it overturned?
  • HPJ888 wrote: »
    What do you mean 11,000 are wrong? As in they were wrongfully convicted, or they were wrong to try to get it overturned?

    11,000 offences prosecuted wrongly.
  • Tilt
    Tilt Posts: 3,599 Forumite
    Well if you want my honest opinion, you're not going to like it.

    I'm a regular user of that stretch of road myself and it is quite clear to me what the signs mean. I think it's just some clever lawyer who has found out that the font isn't quite right and isn't consitant with the traffic signs manual and want's to make a few quid out of it. But lets remember that these are electronic signs so they are going to be slightly different to that you normally see mounted on a post. But I for one know what they are telling me.

    From a good driver pint of view, do they really need to be fully compliant to get you to drive at a safe speed? But then again, I believe that the motorway speed limit should be increased but this being a motorway interchange, then a drop by 10 mph is pretty sensible to me.

    As for whether your conviction should be quashed... well that would depend on what speed you were clocked at doing. If it was no more than 70mph, then I would say yes. If it was no more than 75mph then I would say maybe. More than say 80mph, then it would be a no.
    PLEASE NOTE
    My advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Out of interest OP, what speed were you doing to get 6 points and the £550?

    I'd imagine if you were doing well over the NSL rather than over the currently displayed enforcement speed you may not have a case. Could be wrong though.
  • HPJ888
    HPJ888 Posts: 10 Forumite
    I was doing 81 in a 50. Totally my mistake. I thought it was 70 and I was only doing a little over the limit.

    But, the British legal system, used all over the world, is built on the premise that a conviction must be lawful. Whether I was over the limit or not, if the conviction is unlawful for whatever reason, it has to be quashed. I know it's a loophole but we all have to take the rough with the smooth.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.