We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Are our vendors playing games with us???
Comments
-
£5k on a house you like is this really a deal breaker, when you offered the higher price in the first place, they know you clearly have the money!
Problem with FTb the excitement takes hold and then the head kicks in afterwards causing no end of issues for sellers.0 -
If you are saying £270k now and they are saying £275k because at one point you offered that then perhaps you should try to move things along by splitting the difference if you still want the property?0
-
mrsmchapman wrote: ȣ5k on a house you like is this really a deal breaker, when you offered the higher price in the first place, they know you clearly have the money!
Problem with FTb the excitement takes hold and then the head kicks in afterwards causing no end of issues for sellers.
This works both ways. Surely, the sellers can take just £5k less......
It's weird how people here seem to be taking one side rather than the other.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
This works both ways. Surely, the sellers can take just £5k less......
It's weird how people here seem to be taking one side rather than the other.
No i agree its both ways, but they wouldn't be in this predicament if they had of thought it through a little more. If they didn't believe it was worth the extra £5k they shouldn't have offered it, as if had of been accepted they wouldn't be asking this question. So to me is these people playing the game not the sellers.0 -
mrsmchapman wrote: »they wouldn't be in this predicament if they had of thought it through a little more. If they didn't believe it was worth the extra £5k they shouldn't have offered it, as if had of been accepted they wouldn't be asking this question. So to me is these people playing the game not the sellers.
That certainly reads to me like the offer of 275k was rejected with the explanation the vendor is holding out for full asking price. The OP moves on to viewing other properties. It's only days later that the vendor comes back with a lower expectation of price but I do not see how they can expect to hold the OP to his last offer as they rejected it and have then shown their weakened hand. It is the vendor who should have thought things through more carefully before telling a proceedable buyer that they are wanting full asking price!
It seems to me the vendor is in the predicament as they may lose the property they really want. FTBs are thinner on the ground than houses for sale so naturally it's the vendors who are realistic on price who will achieve a sale. I think the OP did the right thing by backing off, I'd now leave the vendor to think it over some more and return to viewing other houses.0 -
I really didn't think this would cause such a fuss! From reading some of the posts, it seems like there is one rule for the vendors and another for the buyers. Basically, the vendors can use whatever dirty tricks they like to scam more money out of buyers and the buyers just have to play it fair.
I work hard for my money and if I can save 5k, by not doing anything illegal or immoral, I'm certainly going to try it!
Just for clarity, we have never had a bid accepted on this house, only two completely rejected out of hand by the vendors. I think we were well within our rights to renegotiate a price when the vendors came back to us. As I said, we had moved on and were looking at other properties.
If we had a bid accepted, I would certainly not try to gazunder, unless something was wrong with the survey.0 -
WexfordWarrier wrote: »I really didn't think this would cause such a fuss! From reading some of the posts, it seems like there is one rule for the vendors and another for the buyers. Basically, the vendors can use whatever dirty tricks they like to scam more money out of buyers and the buyers just have to play it fair.
I work hard for my money and if I can save 5k, by not doing anything illegal or immoral, I'm certainly going to try it!
Just for clarity, we have never had a bid accepted on this house, only two completely rejected out of hand by the vendors. I think we were well within our rights to renegotiate a price when the vendors came back to us. As I said, we had moved on and were looking at other properties.
If we had a bid accepted, I would certainly not try to gazunder, unless something was wrong with the survey.
Perhaps it was your choice of phrase - "sensing blood" - which has made some posters see red over what you have done.You might as well ask the Wizard of Oz to give you a big number as pay a Credit Referencing Agency for a so-called 'credit-score'0 -
I rather agree with you, WW, or at least I can see both sides of this. In the end, if you are interested in buying, you need to have a price that both sides can work with, and you need somehow to communicate that you will stick to whatever is agreed.
I'd suggest that you continue to look around. You are not in a hurry. It's only your vendors who suddenly are. There will be a lot more property testing the market in the next month or two, as Spring is just in the process of springing at the moment.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
I agree with VH. Both of your offers were rejected, effectively making them now 'voided'. If you wanted to, you could go back with £260k!
Sometimes I wonder about the people on this site. It's supposed to be a money saving, not a moral judgement, website.
The EA is getting two nice junks of commission here. They can eat into that if they're desperate to make these sales happen.
I say stick to your guns and the £270k offer. Good luck!0 -
How long have you been house hunting for?
They rejected both your offers, so you quite rightfully thought about it again, and put in a third offer of what you felt it was worth.
If the vendor wasn't so quick to reject your second offer, then perhaps they would have found themselves £5k up?!
Stick to your guns!
ps - I wouldn't touch a property with parking issues - just not worth the hassle!Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards