We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Legal point for Centipede

In the Easyjet thread, a poster has had a reply from Easyjet, which states:
"You mentioned the preliminary ruling (Sturgeon v Condor & Böck v Air France SA) which was only heard by the Fourth Chamber of the ECJ. In our view this preliminary ruling has only served to confuse an otherwise clear piece of legislation. Furthermore, a preliminary ruling is not afforded the status of binding authority on anything other than the case to which it refers. We are currently seeking to clarify this issue through the courts. "

Fourth Chamber rulings not binding?
Comments please.

Comments

  • Mark2spark
    Mark2spark Posts: 2,306 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Oh I see :rotfl:

    Easyjet have chosen to quote the bit that suits them, and not the Grand Chamber ruling :undecided


    You couldn't make it up sometimes :D
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.