We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

£66 more for 'no fault' accident.

I renewed my van insurance. I told them of an accident I had three years ago when I hit an animal in another vehicle. Thought I did not need to mention when someone hit me two years ago. Always have NCD protected. Got a call saying they found out about the second accident and my insurance had gone up from £350 to £416. An increase of £66 for an accident that was not my fault and cost my insurance company nothing. Why?
And the error was genuine, I thought I did not need to mention a 'non fault' accident.
«1

Comments

  • You have to answer what they are asking....

    Usually something along the lines of "have you had any accidents or claims in the last 5 years"?

    So you have to declare all "incidents" regardless of blame.

    The increased premiums even with non-fault outcomes has been around for a while. In the eyes of an insurer, you got into some mischief and therefore, their statistics suggest you are more likely to again in the future, so the premium gets loaded.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,265 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    An increase of £66 for an accident that was not my fault and cost my insurance company nothing. Why?

    People who have a claim (even non fault) are statistically more likely to have another claim in a short period afterwards. Plus, you have been caught telling lies on an application for insurance. So, you are now higher risk. Both of those things can influence the price.
    And the error was genuine, I thought I did not need to mention a 'non fault' accident.

    It may have been a genuine accident but it was still a false declaration. In all probability the premium hasnt been increased due to that (but could include an admin fee)
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    dunstonh wrote: »
    People who have a claim (even non fault) are statistically more likely to have another claim in a short period afterwards........

    Does "short period" extend to 2+ years?

    OP.........I've successfully reclaimed consequential non fault loadings from the at fault party. If you CBA and still have the details of the accident it might be worth you doing the same
  • lippy1923
    lippy1923 Posts: 1,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    You are lucky they have not cancelled your insurance for non-disclosure. As above, you have to tell them about any iincidents whether you were at fault or not.
    Total Mortgage OP £61,000
    Outstanding Mortgage £27,971
    Emergency Fund £62,100
    I AM NOW MORTGAGE NEUTRAL!!!! <<Sep-20>>

  • thenudeone
    thenudeone Posts: 4,462 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    You can try to claim the extra cost (for the 5 years you usually have to declare it) from the insurer of the driver at fault.

    Some people report success at doing so here, but I'd expect a fight.
    We need the earth for food, water, and shelter.
    The earth needs us for nothing.
    The earth does not belong to us.
    We belong to the Earth
  • It is difficult to quantify how much you will pay extra over the following 5 years due to rates changes, your own personal circumstances possibly changing (which would have a ratings factor) etc etc.

    The legal principle of the claim is there, but getting the maths right and then getting the compensating insurer to agree will be another thing.
  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yep, that's the difficulty....

    Multiplying this years load by 5 seems the obvious way, when I did it I had two (or maybe three) years loadings documented so claimed for those.

    There was a report from another poster on here a while ago where the at fault insurer agreed a round figure. Either £300 or £500 from memory.
  • savercol
    savercol Posts: 85 Forumite
    edited 17 February 2013 at 2:36PM
    vaio wrote: »
    Does "short period" extend to 2+ years?

    OP.........I've successfully reclaimed consequential non fault loadings from the at fault party. If you CBA and still have the details of the accident it might be worth you doing the same

    What is CBA, legal advice?
    Still don't understand how, because someone hit me it is highly likely someone will hit me again. That means that house insurance in Russia will go through the roof following that meteorite, but the chances of that happening again are, well maybe!
    So to get my money back do I go to the other drivers insurance or my insurance and get them to claim for me?
  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    CBA = can be arsed

    If you want to claim it you need to document the additional costs and then contact the at fault insurer...they will resist but (in my case at least) paid once the small claim court papers landed

    If you want assistance composing letters feel free to ask
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,265 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Still don't understand how, because someone hit me it is highly likely someone will hit me again. That means that house insurance in Russia will go through the roof following that meteorite, but the chances of that happening again are, well maybe!

    Insurance is priced on statistics. Statistically, those suffering a claim will statistically be more likely to suffer another one within a short period afterwards. It doesnt mean you will. It just means the pool of people you are grouped with are more likely to have a claim than a pool of people with no claims.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.