PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

What happens if seller pulls out after exchange?

Right, so upon exchange the buyer pays a deposit of 5% or 10% which goes to the vendors solicitors until completion. If the buyer pulls out the vendor/seller will keep this money and can additionally sue for other costs.

Is this correct?

So what happens if the seller decides to pull out?

They have not paid any money in the form of a deposit but would the buyer be able to sue for this amount? Would the buyer also be able to sue for other damages?

Comments

  • losgiganteskid
    losgiganteskid Posts: 965 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
    I believe it is "the norm" that in the circumstances you quote that if the seller decided not to sell after exchange of contracts the seller is liable to pay the purchaser a sum of money equal to that paid by the purchaser as his/her deposit.
  • Cute_'n'_Quirky
    Cute_'n'_Quirky Posts: 2,082 Forumite
    Exchange of Contracts is the point of no return.

    Neither the Seller nor the Buyer can pull out after exchange of contracts, otherwise they would be liable to court action for breach of contract for the whole of the amount of the sale.

    The injured party would be able to claim for loss of the sale, expenses, advertising costs, etc, etc, etc.

    It is not recommended that neither a Buyer nor a Seller attempt this since it will prove to be a very costly exercise.
  • Richard_Webster
    Richard_Webster Posts: 7,646 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The buyer CAN (if wants the expense) obtain an order requiring the specific performance of the contract - i.e that the seller transfers the house to the buyer and gives vacant possession.


    If there is a binding contract,if the buyer tenders the agreed price on the date fixed for completion and the seller refuses to complete, then in theory at least the buyer can compel performance. He might especially do this if similar houses were more expensive. The seller would have to see what deal he could make with the buyer.

    So I agree with the last post - it is not recommended!

    As a conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful but I accept no liability except to fee-paying clients.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.