We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Flight Compensation Claim. what constitutes extraordinary circumstances
Options
Comments
-
Apologies, very new to this. Got it a bit backward, am in court this Friday suing a 'local' airline Loganair, submitted small claim then started reading threads! Anyone familiar with Eivind Kramme v SAS (ECJ case C-396/06)? Useful info in the Advocate General's Opinion but case dropped. Can I still refer to this in court? It is supportive of Vauban's comment in that it makes the point that lack of provision of a replacement plane should also be 'extraordinary' for the airline to claim EC. In my case a 35 minute flight turned into a 1 hr bus ride, 5 hr ferry crossing, 30 min taxi ride plus waiting around. Total delay to destination for cancellation of flight 14hrs 40mins. Think I could have swum home quicker!0
-
Interesting situation as Loganair only have 2 aircraft to cover the Orcadian services and 2 slightly larger covering the Western Isles that possibly couldn't land on the smaller islands anyway.
If one or the Kirkwall base aircraft is being maintained and the other one goes unserviceable there are bound to be cancellations.
(hiring one is pretty much out of the picture as the only others with an AOC in the UK are in Cornwall (3) and the Channel Isles (4) )
Not an excuse as such, just a few facts for background0 -
This is only my second post on these Forums sites and I am very much a novice so please forgive meif I am posting a oint that may have been already covered. Monarch are claiming extraordinary circumstances due to A Rudder Problem which seems regarding through these posts to be a common problem . What really incensed me as my flioght was departing from Gatwick that Monarch advised us that the spare part had to be obtained from France. It is a British airlines flying from a UK airport so you would have thought all spare parts would he held in the UK. Monarch do not reply through their EU Claim line but if you want to get an answer try E Mailing Doreen.Slack@monarch.co.uk. She is based in the Customer Relations department and whilst she will not be able to reply herself she did ensure we got an answer from Monarch EU claims albeit a negative one.0
-
Tim_Richmond wrote: »What really incensed me as my flioght was departing from Gatwick that Monarch advised us that the spare part had to be obtained from France. It is a British airlines flying from a UK airport so you would have thought all spare parts would he held in the UK. .
In effect French plane (Airbus) where most spares are either held in Toulouse (France) or Hamburg. Far to many components on an Airbus for extensive spares to be held by any airline. In addition it is highly likely the plane is not owned by Monarch but a company they lease it from and as it is not their plane they are often restricted on who they can use to repair. Accept that Monarch Airlines are a UK company but look deeper and you will end up in Cancun!0 -
A thought provoking full page coverage in the Money Mail today about Flight delay compensation. It would appear from the contents the CAA has a view on this subject, I am not sure it help as it not specific.At least it highlight a success by a claimant in vourt who is also an avid and helpful contributor to the site. Lets hope you are the first of many, the more successes the greater the pressure on the airlines. County Court judges are not idiots but must read about other cases, although they do not in law create a precedent.0
-
Magic_Moments wrote: »A thought provoking full page coverage in the Money Mail today about Flight delay compensation. It would appear from the contents the CAA has a view on this subject, I am not sure it help as it not specific.At least it highlight a success by a claimant in vourt who is also an avid and helpful contributor to the site. Lets hope you are the first of many, the more successes the greater the pressure on the airlines. County Court judges are not idiots but must read about other cases, although they do not in law create a precedent.
The Money Mail article only shows that extraordinary circumstances covers a wide range of sins. It does indical that most technical problems are not extraordinary circumstances. Congratulation to 111KAB on your victory which I sincerely hope is the first of many. The more victories for claimants that are written up in the press must be of some help to those of use who are waiting for our cases to be heard. I would agree with the fact that judges must be aware of what has gone before.0 -
Is birdstrike an extraordinary circumstance?0
-
As you can see I am new to this. I have unable to trace my original post to see any replies so thought i had gone wrong somewhere and would try again. I'm sorry that you have been inconvenienced by my duplication.0
-
As you can see I am new to this. I have unable to trace my original post to see any replies so thought i had gone wrong somewhere and would try again. I'm sorry that you have been inconvenienced by my duplication.
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=61903117&postcount=20
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards