We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Two separate leases on a single flat

cricketing2013
Posts: 1 Newbie
We are in the process of buying a flat atpresent, but have run into an unexpected situation with the lease – the flat isa share of freehold, but it has two separate 999 year leases for the flatitself. I’d welcome any advice on whether people have come across this beforeand what they would advise that we do. More details below (apologies for length, it’s slightly fiddly)
We are buying a 2 bed flat in a small block. Theflat comes with a share of freehold. There are then two leases for the flat –the first covers the main parts of the flat and the master bedroom, the second coversa second bedroom which was an addition to the flat 20 years ago. The reason forthe two separate leases is that a mistake was made when extending the leasefrom a 99 year lease to a 999 year lease - first time around the extension wasmissed off, and was therefore put onto a separate 999 year. The issue obviouslyisn’t around the length of the lease, as both have more than 950 years to run,but the fact that there are two separate leases covering the property, whichtogether add up to the whole flat.
Our solicitor’s advice hasn’t been very clear.Although they haven’t come across this situation before and agree that it isvery unusual, they haven’t provided a clear line on what our best course ofaction is and what risks there are of buying with the status quo. They alsohaven’t given a clear sense of what it would cost to put the property onto asingle lease. Our feeling is that this is something that the seller should dealwith given it was their mistake and there is a risk that it puts buyers off infuture (as we are ourselves feeling now). We are therefore asking that theseller takes action to put the whole flat onto a single lease, but are awaitingan answer and aren’t convinced that they will say yes. If they don’t, we mayask for the money off the price to pay to do it ourselves, but obviously thereare risks around cost.
Has anyone been in a similar situation? Arethere other big risks attached to the situation that we should be aware of? Any advice greatly welcomed.
We are buying a 2 bed flat in a small block. Theflat comes with a share of freehold. There are then two leases for the flat –the first covers the main parts of the flat and the master bedroom, the second coversa second bedroom which was an addition to the flat 20 years ago. The reason forthe two separate leases is that a mistake was made when extending the leasefrom a 99 year lease to a 999 year lease - first time around the extension wasmissed off, and was therefore put onto a separate 999 year. The issue obviouslyisn’t around the length of the lease, as both have more than 950 years to run,but the fact that there are two separate leases covering the property, whichtogether add up to the whole flat.
Our solicitor’s advice hasn’t been very clear.Although they haven’t come across this situation before and agree that it isvery unusual, they haven’t provided a clear line on what our best course ofaction is and what risks there are of buying with the status quo. They alsohaven’t given a clear sense of what it would cost to put the property onto asingle lease. Our feeling is that this is something that the seller should dealwith given it was their mistake and there is a risk that it puts buyers off infuture (as we are ourselves feeling now). We are therefore asking that theseller takes action to put the whole flat onto a single lease, but are awaitingan answer and aren’t convinced that they will say yes. If they don’t, we mayask for the money off the price to pay to do it ourselves, but obviously thereare risks around cost.
Has anyone been in a similar situation? Arethere other big risks attached to the situation that we should be aware of? Any advice greatly welcomed.
0
Comments
-
It is unusual, but I see no problem. So long as you get leases for the entire property, where's the problem?
My mum bought her house 20 years ago. 5 years later she bought a section of the neighbour's garden, which is now incorporated into her garden (so the house and extended garden are a single fenced property).
But she has 2 freehold Titles - the original one and a new one for the extra garden. Wheh/if she sells, she will sell both Titles together.
Your set-up seems very similar.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards