UK-passport.net

gik

hpuse wrote: »

I suggest you read unfair trading regulation 2008 - only around 88 pages of ramblings?

There's no mention of why that letter is excellent or what 'tremendous pool of contributions' means in that. So can YOU answer my questions?

Valli

hpuse wrote: »

@valli

You forgot to add something, copycats do not take holidays.

Web hosting are so advanced that now a days downtime of their websites can be as less as few seconds for the whole year...
So technically, its a 24/365hr operation, should make least a million. :rotfl:

yeah BUT the time being charged is the VICTIM'S hourly rate; not the sites.

So my post stands.

hpuse

gik wrote: »

There's no mention of why that letter is excellent or what 'tremendous pool of contributions' means in that. So can YOU answer my questions?

GIK,
IF you wont get sleep tonight - here is my answer

Letter is excellent because it addresses the rip-off trade' trading terms, actions and misrepresentation in every possible legal angle to expose their unfair tactics. Such tactics when bought under a court of law will have an adverse effect on the whole of the business, not just a trading arm (i.e the website)

Tremendous pool of contributions mean, one would have to pool in an army of legal experts to counter claim what is said in the letter.

Now, Good night. Stay safe.

hpuse

Valli wrote: »

yeah BUT the time being charged is the VICTIM'S hourly rate; not the sites.

So my post stands.

Of course, your posts stands...They are the best intellectually gifted, thought simulating and competently tagged MSE posts and contain helpful information as always.....I could only wish I get as many "thanks" as you, received, valli....that only a dream though....

Valli

hpuse wrote: »

Of course, your posts stands...They are the best intellectually gifted, thought simulating and competently tagged MSE posts and contain helpful information as always.....I could only wish I get as many "thanks" as you, received, valli....that only a dream though....

Try posting sensible, well-thought out and accurate answers then...

and it's STIMULATING not 'simulating'.

I was referring to ONE post though - in the singular - not every post I have ever made.


Attacking the poster, and not the post, doesn't bring anything at all to the forum. Once again you have attempted to sidestep the point being made.

Fortunately so many forumites are able to see right through you.

What saddens me is that 'newbies', who need accurate advice, won't get it if they read your drivel and attempt to follow the 'advice' you give.

I too am on the side of the consumer. Unlike you I am
(a) a realist and (b) willing to learn - I read, and follow, the advice of other posters, especially on the consumer section parts of the forum.

Your posts are the online equivalent of a 2 year old throwing a tantrum - and getting nowhere!

gik

hpuse wrote: »

GIK,
IF you wont get sleep tonight - here is my answer

Letter is excellent because it addresses the rip-off trade' trading terms, actions and misrepresentation in every possible legal angle to expose their unfair tactics. Such tactics when bought under a court of law will have an adverse effect on the whole of the business, not just a trading arm (i.e the website)

Tremendous pool of contributions mean, one would have to pool in an army of legal experts to counter claim what is said in the letter.



Now, Good night. Stay safe.

Do you ever read what nonsense you post? Do you know and understand the difference between bought and brought?

hpuse

gik wrote: »

Do you ever read what nonsense you post? Do you know and understand the difference between bought and brought?

hahaha thanks for that.
I am glad that my typo made your day! sometimes I rely too much on mozilla to pinpoint my typos...

Valli

hpuse wrote: »

hahaha thanks for that.
I am glad that my typo made your day! sometimes I rely too much on mozilla to pinpoint my typos...

How is it a typo?

THERE IS AN EXTRA LETTER IN THE WORD BROUGHT -

and r is on the top line of the keyboard - nowhere NEAR 'B' or 'O'!

Bought - the past tense of the verb 'buy'.

Brought - the past tense of the verb 'bring'.

It is NOT a typo. It is a commonly-made error.

RosiPossum

Is your constant use of the word "advise" instead of "advice" a typo too, hpuse?

Anyway, I'd have though £10/hr is reasonable...ish. People working as care assistants get less and do hard work. Chasing up refunds and filling in forms shouldn't even be near that.
Although the letter is long, it seems fairly okay until the writer charges £50/hr as a reasonable rate. Then they just look ridiculous.

keyser666

Very clear that letter from the newbie is hpuse under an AE. The wording and the dialect/style if you will is exactly the same as hpuse