We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Law for non married couples for property when they split up
Comments
-
definitely agree, and if you don't feel ready to buy together then you're more along the lines of my friends that I mentioned and as such there's nothing wrong with the arrangement as long as you both know where you stand. Good luck0
-
sciencegeek wrote: »Would you suggest that a single person living on their own is essentially working two full time jobs then? (job 1 = daywork, job 2 = housework). Call me cynical but I can cook clean shop and do all the housy things as well as work full time and the housy stuff only takes about an hour a day.
If a househusband/housewife was spending 8 hours a day on housework it would be like living inside a sterile box it would be so clean!!!
I sometimes feel like I work two full time jobs! I only have myself to look after, thankfully, but if I had someone else to look after, I'm not sure I could cope. Today I'm at home (ill, alas), but housework can be a full time job. Cleaning, cooking, ironing, decorating (a lot of that recently!) all take a lot of time, especially when you leave home at 7:20 and don't get in until 7pm at night. Then there are bills to look after and all that household admin; sorting out issues with boilers and anything else that needs maintaining; gardening etc.
My mother does have quite a relaxed life, as she would admit, but she's also incredibly practical. She paints. She retarmacs the driveway. She reroofs/refelts the sheds. She mends gutters, fixes chimneys, and runs the house. All this is a lot to fit in! And dad loves it because he works hard all day and can then come home to relax with his wife, rather than worry about cleaning/cooking/washing.Errors of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it. - Jefferson0 -
sciencegeek wrote: »Would you suggest that a single person living on their own is essentially working two full time jobs then? (job 1 = daywork, job 2 = housework). Call me cynical but I can cook clean shop and do all the housy things as well as work full time and the housy stuff only takes about an hour a day.
If a househusband/housewife was spending 8 hours a day on housework it would be like living inside a sterile box it would be so clean!!!
If you work away from home then you create less mess in the home cos your not there most of the time.
If you work at home then you have more cleaning and washing up to do as you use your bathroom and kitchen more!!
A househusband/housewife would be doing normal housework stuff plus all the stuff required to look after children especially before and after school. Only when kids are teenagers do some of the responsibilities decrease especially if you teach the kids to do stuff for themselves and the house, like ironing their own school uniform or making them go to school with it creased if they refuse to do it.I'm not cynical I'm realistic
(If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)0 -
Did I click the wrong button and end up on Trisha's (Goddard) forum?Well life is harsh, hug me don't reject me.0
-
Hi everyone and thanks for all your input to (my g/f) zweety's dilemma!
i just wanted to explain the situation from my side.
i have been intending to buy a property for a while now, although it was meant first and foremost to be as an investment. It was not even certain that i would live in the property myself (as i already have a property which i jointly own). Either way, my intention was to buy a 2/3 bedroom flat and rent out the other bedrooms (if i lived there too) or all the bedrooms (if i didn't live there myself). It was not meant to be a home for my future, rather a means to make money!
The situation has of course changed now in that i have met the lovely zweety and would be very happy to live with her.
When we initially discussed living together, my thoughts were that i would still buy a two/three bed flat/house and rent out the others rooms. Had she accepted this, there would have been NO question of me charging her rent at all! However, Zweety has (understandably) made it quite clear she won't accept any lodgers. So, as such, my opinion on the subject is that she needs to contribute in some way. Otherwise, it's simply too much of a financial burden for me right now. The form that the 'rent' takes is unimportant to me. It can mean paying more than 50% for the bills or paying for furniture etc., or it can simply be a normal 'rent'. My preferred option would be the latter. As she says, it would not be more than a couple of hundred quid. That way, we could just simply split everything else 50/50.
It should also be noted that, financially, she is currently not in a position to obtain a mortgage and, if we bought together, her (unfairly) poor credit score - due to the fact that although European, she has only been in the UK for just over a year - would no doubt be a problem. Anyhow, i think that it is just too soon in our relationship to buy together.
In a year or two, if the relationship works out (and we can both afford it), i would definitely consider making her a part owner (and/or stopping the rent payments altogether).
Thanks again for all your opinions - they are much appreciated! :beer:0 -
Interesting conversation. Our lass is is a similar position. This goes back quite a way. Bought a house with previous partner. She paid the deposit on the house but he paid the mortgage and she paid the bills etc.
They split up some 4 years or so ago and just found out he has sold the house. I know that its a long time to wait but wondered if she was entitled to anything. I believe that by law (which ) has recently changed if you are providing towards a house you are entitled to the monies?
Should she get a solicitor involved? They havent' spoken for 3 years probably is it too late?
thanks0 -
Paying to the joint living costs, call it groceries & bills, or rent it doesn't make much difference in practice?
The person buying the house is taking all the financial risks. The person living with partner would be paying rent regardless, so why shouldn't they contribute?
I would expect the partner who bought the house to be subsidising the other partner as they are gaining a house out of it, then both are benefitting financially.
If it's 50/50 then it really should be a joint mortgage..?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards