We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

RSPCA Exposed.

1235»

Comments

  • Pupnik
    Pupnik Posts: 452 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    The RSPCA is a terrible organisation. They should spend more time going after the countless puppy farms and backyard breeders - just go on anywhere like Preloved or Gumtree and see all the hundreds of Staffie puppies being sold there, and try and reduce the amount of unwanted dogs being brought into this world in the first place. It makes me sick when I see uncastrated male dogs (always staffies!) wandering around off a lead. I have nothing against staffies and I would adopt one without a problem but I bet the majority of those dogs the RSPCA put down are unwanted staffies because they just seem to attract owners who don't care about their wellbeing.
  • blueybug
    blueybug Posts: 234 Forumite
    RSPCA are a BUSINESS not a CHARITY thats all you need to know.

    I watched one of their "sad puppy dog eyes" adverts on the TV last night and thought "wow".

    The MD must need a new house or something.

    Support your LOCAL shelters people, these are the ones picking up the !!!!! from the RSPCA.
  • real1314
    real1314 Posts: 4,432 Forumite
    edited 12 January 2013 at 11:13PM
    Statistical clarification:-

    RSPCA destroys less than half the animals it takes in;

    Each year it re-homes 67,500 animals, but has to prevent the continuing suffering of 50,000 for medical reasons through euthenasia. it does however, due to lack of cashflow funding lack the space to house a further 2.8% of animals leading to non-medical euthenasia.

    So, 2.8% of the animals are "destroyed" for non-medical reasons.


    Incidentally, that "death sentence" picture of a bolt gun could be used on the packaging for every meat product (I'm quite keen on eating meat btw) - do they have a pic of a fox being "culled" by a pack of hounds for comparative purposes, so that that "the countryside alliance" can been seem in the same way
    (don't really object that much to fox hunting either, although I can see the cruelty point ; the merits of culling the weak are valid but a bit odd though - why would farmers want the healthiest foxes to survive?)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.