We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
has anyone heard of this before?
Comments
-
He wasn't talking about the british expedition that was trying to drill into a lake 3km below the surface?
That was the Antarctic.0 -
retiredin2011 wrote: »That was the Antarctic.
Appreciate that, and that this is a few days old now.
I just assumed the OP / Original engineer made a mistake.
It made more sense than drilling on what is, effectively, a giant iceberg that mostly melts every year (as opposed to a frozen over piece of land).
You could surely just carve that off instead of drilling into it?
I appreciate the arctic circle does contain "actual land" but the OP specified the Arctic which i associate with the bit on / near the pole.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards