We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
When my dad was my age he owned a four-bed semi - so why am I still in a rented dump?
Comments
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Working hard increases the possibility of being successful.
He does have a point. Yes to be successful without working hard is difficult. That said, I know plenty of people who work hard in low paying roles who will never get anywhere because they aren't planning their career etc. Being a really hard working shelf stacker doesn't get you to general manager, especially if the company already sees you as not being management material.Having a signature removed for mentioning the removal of a previous signature. Blackwhite bellyfeel double plus good...0 -
He does have a point. Yes to be successful without working hard is difficult. That said, I know plenty of people who work hard in low paying roles who will never get anywhere because they aren't planning their career etc. Being a really hard working shelf stacker doesn't get you to general manager, especially if the company already sees you as not being management material.
Organisations are on the whole pyramid structures. So at every level opportunities become more and more restricted. There's plenty more hours in a week after the day job is done. If an individual has the aspiration and desire to do achieve something.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Organisations are on the whole pyramid structures. So at every level opportunities become more and more restricted. There's plenty more hours in a week after the day job is done. If an individual has the aspiration and desire to do achieve something.
Yes thats right, its all the fault of the individuals. Not, obviously, the individuals who didnt have to work 60 hours a week to have a normal life, the baby boomers; but the people who are young now.0 -
The young and intelligent should be working on their escape plan.
Otherwise they will just end up paying for someone else to have a nice home, while they have none, for a generous pension, while they will get the bare minimum to live.
Get out while you still can.0 -
-
The question I favour is this one:
To anyone who thinks it's just a case of "working hard" etc....
If you lost your house today, and had to start from scratch again, could you buy your equivalent house within a five year period?
Majority of the time, for those who are honest, the answer is no. That says it all really.0 -
ruggedtoast wrote: »Yes thats right, its all the fault of the individuals. Not, obviously, the individuals who didnt have to work 60 hours a week to have a normal life, the baby boomers; but the people who are young now.
No its a choice. That every one has.
What's a normal life? I've never had a right to anything. What I've got personally is through my own endeavours. I consider myself lucky. So I try and help others less fortunate whenever I can.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »No its a choice. That every one has.
What's a normal life? I've never had a right to anything. What I've got personally is through my own endeavours. I consider myself lucky. So I try and help others less fortunate whenever I can.
If you're a boomer a considerable amount of what you have personally is down to a long benign economic cycle which saw widescale demand for British goods and services from the developing world, combined with a successive governments offering you structural benefits the bill for which you all gave to your children, just at the point the jobs all went East.
Allowing us to build a few houses so we dont have to pay you 2/3 of our net pay in rent would be a nice gesture. Apparently that is too much to ask though.0 -
I think it is obviously harder for young people nowadays especially trying to rent or buy a house in London and the South East and I'm saying that as someone in their thirties who was able to get a mortgage for a house in London so I don't have any particular axe to grind with regards to the older/younger generation debate.;)0
-
It is entirely the fault of the boomer parents.
They are being jolly unfair by living longer and longer and hence not carving up the family fortune until after the kids need it.Sealed pot challange no: 3390
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
