Northern rock loan over £25,000

carlyberyl

I can't seem to find it, can anyone tell me in plain English what's happening

e.scrooge

Thanks RockRocked

Web address for others is:

http://casetracker.justice.gov.uk/listing_calendar/getDetail.do?case_id=20150150

carlyberyl

I can't get on that one either it keeps saying page forbidden

e.scrooge

Seems to be something to do with the construction of the webpage. Worked ok for me a few times but now I get "Forbidden too". You will need to go to:

http://casetracker.justice.gov.uk/listing_calendar/search.jsp

and enter the case number ie 20150150

Hopefully this now works!

fermi

Currently says.

Case Tracker for Civil Appeals


Summary Case Details for 20150150


Case

Reference: A3/2015/0150
Title: NRAM Plc v McAdam & Anr
Type: Permission to Appeal
Appeal / Application:


for permission to appeal and expedited hearing
Hearing Status: Window of 11-Mar-15 to 01-Apr-15
Venue: London
Constitution:
Not assigned
Not assigned
Not assigned


Case results:


Track Your Case:

Current Status: Awaiting bundles and/or documents from applicant/applicant''s solicitors

Tracking Information:

15-Jan-15: Letter sent to applicant/solicitor to request bundles and/or documents

NorthernRockVictim

fermi wrote: »

Currently says.

Are you touting for business on this forum as some kinda debt guru? Because that's what it would appear to the victims here, and in the circumstances that's not good at all. Red warnings and a boast of your elevated MSE status won't help us whatsoever!

jimbo5661

I don't think he is, he (or she!) is just posting a screen shot of the case tracker page that many people couldn't access. He's been thanked over 41,000 times so isnt 'touting for trade' by the looks!

Back to the subject of the thread, if NRAM are successful, can the appeal results be appealed?!

fermi

jimbo5661 wrote: »

I don't think he is, he (or she!) is just posting a screen shot of the case tracker page that many people couldn't access. He's been thanked over 41,000 times so isnt 'touting for trade' by the looks!

Correct.

My signature is there underneath all my posts. Not a boast or touting or anything like that.

As you say... back to the subject at hand.

NorthernRockVictim

fermi wrote: »

correct.

My signature is there underneath all my posts. Not a boast or touting or anything like that.

As you say... Back to the subject at hand.

then i apologise!

downhiller

Wow. Hadn't checked in on this thread in ages and to be honest I'd given up. I was one of the 300 complainants but I honestly thought it was dead. I hadn't heard anything about the court case.

A lot of talk about what period any refunds/ compensation/ interest would apply. Unless I'm mistaken our issue is completely separate from the original CCA, or more accurately it's in addition to that. In a nutshell we had non-compliant statements for an agreement that was non-compliant in the first place. For those with sub 25k loans, their non-compliance is the advertised period. For those of us with 25k+ loans, we've been non-compliant since we first took the loans out, and we continue to be non-compliant as I've never signed any updated agreement that my loan isn't regulated by the CCA. The original non-compliant agreement still stands.

So in terms of redress, my loan commenced in May 2007. I've added up all my statements, and by the time the appeal is heard in April at the latest, I will have paid just over £17k in payments and £11k in interest.

Surely any refund must cover the entire loan period until they issue us with updated loan agreements?