We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
BT charges
Comments
-
[STRIKE]But does it?Wether it is monthly or quartely it is only one process, so why does it cost more per quater than it does for monthly.
Do they charge differently?
AIUI, BT charges the £4.50 on a 'per bill not paid by direct debit' basis (i.e. if you're on monthly billing you get the £4.50 charge and if you're on quarterly billing, you get the £4.50 charge - one bill, one charge of £4.50).[/STRIKE]
Deleted when definitive information showed the post to be WRONG!Time has moved on (much quicker than it used to - or so it seems at my age) and my previous advice on residential telephony has been or is now gradually being overtaken by changes in the retail market. Hence, I have now deleted links to my previous 'pearls of wisdom'. I sincerely hope they helped save some of you money.0 -
Old day's, not relevant.
Now it is a processing charge/cost.
Why does it cost 300% more to process one bill from another?
Lets hope the regulator can say why when we have the consultation.
Not to mention any differences between paying Cash, Cheque or online banking.0 -
correct.Mytheroo wrote:Why does it cost less to process Mr A's monthly payment as to process Mr B's quarterly payment?
The only real answer is that it isn't a payment processing fee.
It's a con. BT already operate a billing mechanism where 'dad debt' is factored into their retail prices. (Every Retailer in the commercial universe does this)Thank you for your correspondence. Every single customer is important to us and we take your views seriously.
...............
We have introduced these changes because it costs more to accept non-Direct Debit payments from customers. This is not just because of the cost of taking the payments, but because on average customers are more likely to forget to pay or not pay, and this leaves us with bad debt of around £100 million a year.
.........................
Yours sincerely
pp
Gillian Lewis
Head of Complaint Management, Customer Services
It's a con. BT already charge late payment penalties to cover costs of chasing late bills.
The rolling £1.50/month penalty is to force customers onto direct debit.
0 -
old laws are relevant the Bill Of Rights Act and Magna Carta are 2 of just 7 laws which make up the mega big laws of the UK these overide laws which have a smaller status and the bill of rights say fines and forfiets are illegal without conviction, the magna carta states you cannot take anyones possesion without a trial by your peers or by the law of the land
Bill of Rights Act 1689 section 12
Magna Carta 1215 section 39 (rev 1225 sec 39 & 1297 sec 29)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards