IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Another Excel parking fine

Options
2»

Comments

  • taffy056
    taffy056 Posts: 4,895 Forumite
    The thing is where you hit them is their pockets, appeal to popla cost them £32.40 no matter the outcome, if it succeeds its the end of the matter, but if it loses you can ignore as popla is binding on them but not you. I know if this goes to court they will have a hard job to win, your defence will be the email from them admitting you paid, and they want £60 knowing that. I think that the judge will have them on contempt. Frankly I'm amazed they are considering going ahead.
    Excel Parking, MET Parking, Combined Parking Solutions, VP Parking Solutions, ANPR PC Ltd, & Roxburghe Debt Collectors. What do they all have in common?
    They are all or have been suspended from accessing the DVLA database for gross misconduct!
    Do you really need to ask what kind of people run parking companies?
  • ManxRed
    ManxRed Posts: 3,530 Forumite
    Your Appeal.

    1. As Excel are not the landholders of this site then they do not have sufficient authority to make an offer for parking, and hence formed no contract with the driver. Hence no breach took place and no sum is due to Excel (see VCS v HMRC)

    2. Excel have been made aware via my provision of a copy of the ticket, that the landowner has suffered no loss whatsoever and hence the sum sought would (if the contract did exist, which I refute) be considered a punitive penalty, and hence unenforceable under contract law (see Dunlop vs New Motor Garage).


    Send them that. Let us know what they say in response!
    Je Suis Cecil.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.