Samsung D900 vs Nokia 6300

tonytooth

hi guys,
about to update my phone with O2..
choice narrowed down to one of these two..
any advice on which is the best??
cheers

shortguy4u

Check out this comparison on gsmarena...may help you decide.

From that comparison...they are pretty similar....D900 has better camera and battery life, but 6300 has a better screen. They are prety much the same size and weight, but the D900 does slide, making it a lil shorter.

gaming_guy

the d900 has an autofocus camera and more internal memory (means you can hold more stuff on the phone without buying a memory card)

vwman_3

tonytooth wrote: »

hi guys,
about to update my phone with O2..
choice narrowed down to one of these two..
any advice on which is the best??
cheers

I had the D900 (still do) and it's a good phone but the Nokia which I bought today after seeing a friends is far better imo, all down to choice........

wizzywas

Nokia's are much easier to use and th ease of doing everything is better. i have got 6300 and its a great phone u cant go wrong with it my mate has the D900 and it is not all that. usability is not that good. and Nokia's are more reliable.

kaz250

i have a d900 and i think its a great phone very easy to use, good memory and a fantastic camera. I've seen a friends 6300 and i am not all that impressed

Rev

I've just upgraded to the 6300 from a samsung, not the D900 but a few friends have them and while it's a nice phone I wouldn't have it over a nokia. Samsungs are a lot less customisable than nokia's and not as easy to use. The D900 has a great camera though.

tonytooth

thanks guys for all your input.
i popped into cpw and had a look. didnt really like look of the 6300, bit plain for my tastes, so plumped for the d900...
thanks again