We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Daughter Buying Me A House: Pitfalls? Advice?

123457

Comments

  • Annisele
    Annisele Posts: 4,835 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I appreciate that I have to give up my plan but it makes me quite angry that meddling bureaucrats can stop me from spending my hard-earned money exactly how I want to.

    It's nothing to do with bureaucrats.

    You can spend *your* money however you want. If you could afford the house outright, there'd be no problem.

    However, you can't spend the *bank's* money unless the bank agrees.
  • zzzLazyDaisy
    zzzLazyDaisy Posts: 12,497 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Annisele wrote: »

    However, you can't spend the *bank's* money unless the bank agrees.

    And this is your problem.

    Most (all?) lenders will refuse to lend in this set of circumstances.
    I'm a retired employment solicitor. Hopefully some of my comments might be useful, but they are only my opinion and not intended as legal advice.
  • Annisele wrote: »
    It's nothing to do with bureaucrats.

    You can spend *your* money however you want. If you could afford the house outright, there'd be no problem.

    However, you can't spend the *bank's* money unless the bank agrees.

    I think you're splitting hairs. The bank/building society would get their pound of flesh wouldn't they?
  • holly_hobby
    holly_hobby Posts: 5,363 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    But its nothing to do with bureaucrats - it is to do with lenders protecting their interest in the case of possession and you pursing the return of your capital injection, so its commercial law and your personal circs that are scuppering your plans for purchasing a home via your D.

    Of course, your D could as I say could be conservative with the facts surrounding the purchase - but that would be a decision and consequences for you and your D to contemplate.

    Hope this helps

    H
  • It's the mortgage company taking the risk in this convoluted scheme and no wonder why they would not entertain it.

    Have you explored getting a mortgage yourself yet? I do not think this beyond the realms of possibility.
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • zzzLazyDaisy
    zzzLazyDaisy Posts: 12,497 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    I think you're splitting hairs. The bank/building society would get their pound of flesh wouldn't they?

    Not necessarily. There is a perfectly good legal argument that in buying the house with a gifted deposit from the tenants, that the tenants then obtain a beneficial interest in the property. This could mean that if your daughter defaulted on the mortgage repayments the lender would find it difficult or impossible to repossess. This means that the lender's charge over the house is potentially worthless.

    It is for this reason that most, and possibly all, lenders will not lend against this type of arrangement.

    Lenders have tightened up considerably on their lending criteria - remember the toxic debt crisis? You may not, but lenders certainly have.
    I'm a retired employment solicitor. Hopefully some of my comments might be useful, but they are only my opinion and not intended as legal advice.
  • Another great annoyance to me is the conflicting advice which I have been given.

    On this forum (and I believe the consensus that I cannot proceed with my "plan") I have been told in no uncertain terms not to go ahead. Thank you.

    I have, however, also contacted 4 independent financial advisors each of which has told me that there is not a problem (legal or otherwise) and that they can get the mortgage I require all above board.

    As a layman, who am I supposed to believe? Is it just that these financial advisors want to earn a quick buck in commission and to hell with the consequences?
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,574 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    [QUOTE=Yorkie1;58318187
    If you have got formal advice elsewhere that you can pull the wool over the lender's eyes about either the source of the deposit or your residential status, then fine - go with them. They have professional indemnity insurance. [/QUOTE]
    I have, however, also contacted 4 independent financial advisors each of which has told me that there is not a problem (legal or otherwise) and that they can get the mortgage I require all above board.

    As a layman, who am I supposed to believe? Is it just that these financial advisors want to earn a quick buck in commission and to hell with the consequences?

    If you have had professional advice from people with indemnity insurance and want to go ahead, that's your choice.

    Personally, I would record what's being said in meetings to avoid the problems later where they insist you didn't tell them certain things otherwise they would never have advised you to go ahead with your plan.
  • holly_hobby
    holly_hobby Posts: 5,363 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker

    I have, however, also contacted 4 independent financial advisors each of which has told me that there is not a problem (legal or otherwise) and that they can get the mortgage I require all above board.

    I assume you mean mortgage broker not IFA whom don't tend to be involved in mges.

    If you have 4 advisors tell you this is perfectly acceptable, then why come back here asking for further assistance ?

    As a layman, who am I supposed to believe? Is it just that these financial advisors want to earn a quick buck in commission and to hell with the consequences?

    I hope thats not the case, more they are inexperienced in situations such as this, and are merely ASSUMING there won't be a problem as they don't understand the possessionary aspects of a gift with reservation as discussed.

    My own comments come as a financial & mge advisor and someone with many yrs mge experience.

    If you don't want to accept what we say here, then go with the advisors whom say no problem - afterall they have indemnity ins you can potentially claim off for mis-direction - whilst we have no ulterior motive, other than to share experience.

    H
  • I assume you mean mortgage broker not IFA whom don't tend to be involved in mges.

    If you have 4 advisors tell you this is perfectly acceptable, then why come back here asking for further assistance ?




    I hope thats not the case, more they are inexperienced in situations such as this, and are merely ASSUMING there won't be a problem as they don't understand the possessionary aspects of a gift with reservation as discussed.

    My own comments come as a financial & mge advisor and someone with many yrs mge experience.

    If you don't want to accept what we say here, then go with the advisors whom say no problem - afterall they have indemnity ins you can potentially claim off for mis-direction - whilst we have no ulterior motive, other than to share experience.

    H

    Why do you find it necessary to be so rude and nasty?

    I HAVE accepted the advice given on here and I have said that I do NOT plan to proceed with my original intention.

    For your information, of the people I contacted they all claimed to be independent financial advisors AND mortgage brokers and I contacted them BEFORE I posted on this forum.

    In future, please get your facts assembled before going on the offensive.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.