We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Is this worth going to Small Claims Court

24

Comments

  • vaio wrote: »
    Spot on, unless the garage was negligent (in the legal sense) then they have no liability.

    If one of the mechanics had set fire to the garage whilst welding then that's negligent but you might struggle to prove negligence if it was external arsonists.

    Don't agree with this. The garage was responsible for the safe custody of the OP's property. Bailment.

    The garage ought to have had insurance against the material risk of a fire, theft, etc. They didn't.

    As others have said, enforcing rights against an individual with no insurance will be difficult. Worth investigating further though.
  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    vaio wrote: »
    Spot on, unless the garage was negligent (in the legal sense) then they have no liability.

    If one of the mechanics had set fire to the garage whilst welding then that's negligent but you might struggle to prove negligence if it was external arsonists.


    Rubbish. Negligence has nothing to do with it. They would be responsible for the goods whilst in their possession irrespective.
  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Bailment only places a duty to take reasonable care of the bike, I still think the OP is going to struggle given that the damage was caused by external arsonists.
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 3 November 2012 at 1:52AM
    vaio wrote: »
    Bailment only places a duty to take reasonable care of the bike, I still think the OP is going to struggle given that the damage was caused by external arsonists.
    Exactly, no one is saying the garage owner doesn't have a duty of care to the OP, but in order for them to be found liable a court must show they didn't take reasonable care, or in this case the "bailee" can show that the loss or damage to the OP's goods was not their fault.
  • zenmaster
    zenmaster Posts: 3,151 Forumite
    I would have thought that having no insurance is negligence and lacking in due care in itself.

    Whether they would have any assets worth suing for is another matter.
  • paddyrg
    paddyrg Posts: 13,543 Forumite
    Whatever, OP, if you do decide to punt £50 on small claims action, get in before everyone else - the other peoples insurance companies won't leave a lot for you to chew on if they get there first.
  • withabix
    withabix Posts: 9,508 Forumite
    trampy68 wrote: »

    I've had my motorcycle in for repair at a local mechanics, it was on SORN so not insured.


    how did you get it there?
    British Ex-pat in British Columbia!
  • Hintza
    Hintza Posts: 19,420 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    withabix wrote: »
    how did you get it there?

    Pushed it, rode, it, put it on a trailer, put it in the back of car/van.

    Who cares, not relevant.
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    withabix wrote: »
    how did you get it there?
    As above, how's this relevant other than some feeble attempt point score.
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    zenmaster wrote: »
    I would have thought that having no insurance is negligence and lacking in due care in itself.
    I'm pretty certain it isn't.

    The question that has to be asked is purely related to the damage/loss itself, ie, was the garage owner negligent or didn't act reasonable in preventing the goods in his possesion from being damaged or lossed. The fact that they had insurance or not doesn't come into it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.