We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Nationwide Oct: +0.6%
Comments
-
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »And in the meantime, they pay you a whopping great yield for owning them. (Either realised or imputed)
:beer:
Please explain.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Please explain.
Sure.
A house generates a rental yield, whether realised (cash paid to you) or imputed (cash you don't have to pay to rent instead of own).
Example:
HAMISH owns and lives in a house worth 220k. Rental yields in Aberdeen are typically 7%. HAMISH gets the benefit of an imputed rent of £15,400 a year.
Against that, HAMISH has to pay either interest on a mortgage of 2.5%, and/or take into account opportunity cost on cash holdings.
So I get paid around £10,000 a year to own instead of rent, based on the above.
Of course, in Aberdeen house prices also rose by 4% in the last year (Halifax). So that's another £8800, for a total gain of £18,800 from owning instead of renting in the last year alone.
Hope that clears it up.
“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Well said. The HPC chain gang won't like reading that0
-
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »
Hope that clears it up.
Not really, though does clear up how warped your mind is!
Can you buy a sandwich with these riches? Does the income get paid into your current account?
I decided to buy a car, instead of renting one all year round....I wonder how much I'm getting paid for that as I don't appear to have received any of the monies yet. Presumably I'm storing up a windfall here.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Not really, though does clear up how warped your mind is!
Do I need to use smaller words?
It's really not that difficult to understand......:(Can you buy a sandwich with these riches? Does the income get paid into your current account?
Yes. And yes.
There is an extra £10,000 a year in my current account from owning versus renting.
If I rented instead of owned, then my outgoings would be £10,000 a year higher. And a penny saved is a penny earned..... Or in this case, a million pennies....
That's a lot of sandwiches.:D“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Why not just say you have saved....rather than trying to imply you are making money via rent from your house? Y'knpw...like normal people?
It would be a lot easier, and you wouldn't look quite so silly.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Why not just say you have saved....rather than trying to imply you are making money via rent from your house? Y'knpw...like normal people?
It would be a lot easier, and you wouldn't look quite so silly.
And on a board set up for discussion of economic topics, you'd look a lot less silly if you understood basic economic terms.
Imputed rent is so broadly accepted it's even a component of GDP.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imputed_rent“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »And on a board set up for discussion of economic topics, you'd look a lot less silly if you understood basic economic terms.
Imputed rent is so broadly accepted it's even a component of GDP.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imputed_rent
Yer, but I did understand it, didn't I.
All I asked is if you could spend this money on a sandwich, and it's had you suggest you can buy loads of sandwiches with your inputed rent, which is nonsense anyway, as for anyone who has an inputted rent of £1000 a month, but no money left over after bills, they can't buy a sandwich. It may have passed you buy, but it's the money in your pocket that buys you things in shops....
So to combat the tricky question surrounding the sandwich, you've pretended I don't understand what you were talking about,l when quite clearly I do.
You've saved 10k a year vs renting Hamish. That is all. It's not an income. It's not a yield. It's just a saving vs renting the equivalent building.
By what your saying I could afford to go and buy a sandwich in the below scenario....
I want a TV, I have £200 to my name in my back pocket. I go into currys, see the TV I want, but its priced at £230. So I go nextdoor to Sainsburys. I see exactly the same model for £200. I buy the TV for £200.
I've saved £30. My stomach is whinging at me, so I decide to buy a sandwich. I reach into my back pocket to find, to my absolute astonishment, £30 hasn't arrived in my back pocket and I've spent every penny I have on a TV. I can't buy a sandwich.
But in Hamish land....oh I can!!. I can use that £30 saving to buy a sandwich. I just can't actually have a sandwich and obvious I just don't understand. :doh:
I guess you'd better either run away or come up with a suitable insult!0 -
Excellent work there graham, really top notch back back peddling.
It is absolutely clear to everyone else on the planet that someone paying ten grand a year less to own than to rent is in fact, ten grand a year better off than they would be if they were renting.
It's really that simple.
Do try to keep up.
“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Excellent work there graham, really top notch back back peddling.
It is absolutely clear to everyone else on the planet that someone paying ten grand a year less to own than to rent is in fact, ten grand a year better off than they would be if they were renting.
It's really that simple.
Do try to keep up.
Yer, which is why I said, they are saving 10k.
It was YOU who suggested you could buy stuff with your inputed rent you made on your yield in your own home. No one else. You.
Point proven.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
