We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: Energy firms must offer (not give) cheapest deals, says Ofgem

Options
"Regulator Ofgem plans to force suppliers to offer their cheapest tariff to customers, in the latest energy development ..."
«13456710

Comments

  • Consumerist
    Consumerist Posts: 6,311 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Ofgem will consult on a package of plans, which include:
    . . .
    A trial to make suppliers tell vulnerable consumers and those who haven't switched for a long time about the cheapest tariff across the whole market.
    . . .
    I'm all in favour of simplifying tariffs but I don't see this provision making it through the consultation.

    It's unprecedented to force a business to effectively promote a rival's product. I would, ordinarily, regard such a promotion with grave suspicion.
    >:)Warning: In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  • Wywth
    Wywth Posts: 5,079 Forumite
    Ofgem will consult on a package of plans, which include:
    • ...
    • Stopping providers from charging different rates depending on how much energy they consume. Currently, some charge more for the first set of units which means low users pay disproportionately more
    Your interpretation appears somewhat different to that stated in the official Ofgem press release (link given in this earlier thread)
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4240447

    Ofgem's press release states:

    2. Ofgem’s proposals for consultation include:
    Simpler – making it easier to compare suppliers
    [FONT=Verdana,Verdana][FONT=Verdana,Verdana]
    ...
    iii. All tariffs have a standing charge and unit rate.
    [/FONT]
    [/FONT]


    i.e. Ebico would not object to your interpretation, but will not be at all happy with the Ofgem stated proposal.
    Ebico tariffs already offer a single rate and no daily standing charge. They, with the support of their customers, do not wish to impose a daily standing charge on their customers.
  • Most of what is planned makes perfect sense and should have been done years ago.

    However, low users will clearly feel the pain if Ofgem forces the energy companies to return to standing charge and single unit rate (I'm a low user, so I'll be letting them know as part of their "consultation"). I can see why they've gone down this road though (as otherwise their comparison tool would remain complicated and fuzzy).

    There is still hope though. The press brief doesn't seem to completely rule out no standing charge tariffs (although this is clearly what the regulator seems to want), but rather indicates that tariffs must be presented with standing charge and unit price. Obviously there will be one unit price (i.e. no more "higher" rate tier on first x units) but Ofgem may still allow single unit (above average) price and nil or nominal standing charge if firms chose that as one of their four tariffs?
  • malcolmffc
    malcolmffc Posts: 339 Forumite
    edited 19 October 2012 at 2:30PM
    Expect to see all the cheap fixed tariffs vanish the moment these proposals are implemented.

    I really don't understand why consumers who are pro-active enough to find the best deal for themselves (and check regularaly that it is still the best tariff) should have to pay more because the majority of the population can't be arsed to spend 15 minutes on uSwitch once a year.

    All this talk of "confusing" bills is nonsense - it's primary school maths for goodness' sakes! People need to make take more responsibility for thier financial well-being
  • penrhyn
    penrhyn Posts: 15,215 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    malcolmffc wrote: »
    Expect to see all the cheap fixed tariffs vanish the moment these proposals are implemented.

    I really don't understand why consumers who are pro-active enough to find the best deal for themselves (and check regularaly that it is still the best tariff) should have to pay more because the majority of the population can't be arsed to spend 15 minutes on uSwitch once a year.

    All this talk of "confusing" bills is nonsense - it's primary school maths for goodness' sakes! People need to make take more responsibility for their financial well-being

    My thoughts exactly.
    That gum you like is coming back in style.
  • victor2
    victor2 Posts: 8,135 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    malcolmffc wrote: »
    I really don't understand consumers who are pro-active enough to find the best deal for themselves (and check regularaly that it is still the best tariff) should pay more simply because the majority of the population can't be arsed to spend 15 minutes on uSwitch once a year.

    All this talk of "confusing" bills is nonsense - it's primary school maths for goodness' sakes!

    It's really not a case of consumers who can't be arsed and it's certainly beyond primary school maths.
    Perhaps you could explain at a primary school level, how the readings on their gas meters are converted to kWh, before you get on to the simplicity of how it's billed.

    I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the In My Home MoneySaving, Energy and Techie Stuff boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. 

    All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.

  • welshee
    welshee Posts: 364 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    malcolmffc wrote: »
    Expect to see all the cheap fixed tariffs vanish the moment these proposals are implemented.

    I really don't understand why consumers who are pro-active enough to find the best deal for themselves (and check regularaly that it is still the best tariff) should have to pay more because the majority of the population can't be arsed to spend 15 minutes on uSwitch once a year.

    All this talk of "confusing" bills is nonsense - it's primary school maths for goodness' sakes! People need to make take more responsibility for thier financial well-being

    Here here .

    And if they cannot do it for themselves ask a relative, friend or neighbour.
    Surely they can ask someone for five mins of their time !
    :eek:
  • wantanswers
    wantanswers Posts: 3,220 Forumite
    malcolmffc wrote: »

    I really don't understand why consumers who are pro-active enough to find the best deal for themselves (and check regularaly that it is still the best tariff) should have to pay more because the majority of the population can't be arsed to spend 15 minutes on uSwitch once a year.

    Why should the majority of the population including the elderly have to dig around to find the best Tariff?

    @ Welshee can you tell me how to convert units into Kwhr my grandmother would like to know?
  • pooch
    pooch Posts: 828 Forumite
    victor2 wrote: »
    ...and it's certainly beyond primary school maths.
    You may be right based on this recent thread on the Student board :eek:
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4221663
    Perhaps more like degree level for today's kids ;)
    victor2 wrote: »
    Perhaps you could explain at a primary school level, how the readings on their gas meters are converted to kWh, before you get on to the simplicity of how it's billed.

    Obtain difference in meter readings

    Multiply by 2.83 to give you the number of cubic metres of gas used.
    (If you have a newer metric meter measuring gas in cubic metres you do not need to do this).

    Multiply by the temperature and pressure figure (1.02264).

    Multiply by colorific value (provided on the bill, typically somewhere in the range 37.5-42.5)

    Divide by 3.6

    :)
  • wantanswers
    wantanswers Posts: 3,220 Forumite
    pooch wrote: »
    You may be right based on this recent thread on the Student board :eek:
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4221663
    Perhaps more like degree level for today's kids ;)



    Obtain difference in meter readings

    Multiply by 2.83 to give you the number of cubic metres of gas used.
    (If you have a newer metric meter measuring gas in cubic metres you do not need to do this).

    Multiply by the temperature and pressure figure (1.02264).

    Multiply by colorific value (provided on the bill, typically somewhere in the range 37.5-42.5)

    Divide by 3.6

    :)

    Wow! thanks for that i'll pass it onto my 84 year old Granny. Shell be grateful she can now work out how much gas shes using in kwhr.

    I'll just multiply my usage (cu mt) by 11.6 its roughly where i want to be.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.