We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Using 10m of Vitreous enamel flue pipe???

This may be a stupid question to those in the know, but , I'm not! I installed a Villager stove about 5 years ago into an Inglenook type fireplace. The fire is connected to the register plate with a 1m long flue pipe. The chimney is roughly 10m long and is not lined. As the open fire used to draw well I thought this would be OK. It's been great so far in all sorts of weather.

My question is, as the top of the chimney is straight up roughly 10m would I have more control/better output by using 10 x 1m flue pipe all connected to the top of the chimney. By connecting them with heat sealant I could regularly take the pipes out and sweep them myself.The chimney pot is a H type pot that works in all sort of winds and doesn't let any water down.

All thoughts most welcome, cost of 10m of flue pipe £190.

Comments

  • PaulF81
    PaulF81 Posts: 1,727 Forumite
    If it ain't broke, why fix it? If you are sure your flue is fine, why bother lining it? Nothing in the regs to say you have to have a lined flue.
  • Skulls
    Skulls Posts: 369 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 25 September 2012 at 10:31AM
    Just thinking if I only heat a 6" pipe instead of a 2' x 6' chimney, it's that size for the first 6-7m, it would be more efficient.
    Forgot to say thanks for your reply!
  • PaulF81
    PaulF81 Posts: 1,727 Forumite
    Are you having problems with the chimney though? If you have a good draw, efficiency doesn't come into it. I wouldn't recommend using separate sections as there is too much potential for a leak. With the pot blocked off from the remainder of the flue, you are looking at making a death trap if it leaks.

    Either use the proper materials (twin wall flue pipe, preferably 904) or stick with what you got would be my advice
  • suisidevw
    suisidevw Posts: 2,256 Forumite
    You could get 10m of 316/316 liner for £190!
  • Skulls
    Skulls Posts: 369 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    With the 1m sections I can install from the bottom, the retainer plate is about 1.3 m high. And it would be easy to take down say twice a year to sweep.
  • I don't see why you would want to take it all down to sweep it? Chimney sweeps don't pull liners out to sweep them!
  • PaulF81
    PaulF81 Posts: 1,727 Forumite
    Skulls wrote: »
    With the 1m sections I can install from the bottom, the retainer plate is about 1.3 m high. And it would be easy to take down say twice a year to sweep.

    You are going to have to replace the pot anyhow so what difference does it make if you install from below or above? The mess you would generate would be huge if you took it out, very dusty.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.