We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Whose fault was this one?
Comments
-
You don't know that he failed to check the lane he was crossing.0
-
I'm not going to defend the m/cyclist's speed, it was a bit fast IMO. But surely the simple fact is that the Passat should have been edging out EXPECTING a bike OR a car to be driving down there at anything up to 30mph.0
-
Why? That section of road is one lane in each direction, and the lane to the Passat's right was stopped.0
-
-
Norman_Castle wrote: »I'm a reasonable person. I don't accept what he has done is reasonable.
Well Brat obviously thinks it is reasonable to pull out in front of motorcyclists without looking.0 -
Norman_Castle wrote: »Everyone knows he failed to check the lane he was crossing.
If he didn't, then he must have deliberately taken out the motorcyclist.0 -
I'm not going to defend the m/cyclist's speed, it was a bit fast IMO. But surely the simple fact is that the Passat should have been edging out EXPECTING a bike OR a car to be driving down there at anything up to 30mph.
Exactly. And if he had done, then there would have been no collision.0 -
-
Is it really reasonable to expect someone to create a second lane where none actually exists?
It's fine to do that if you can get away with it, but the onus is on you to ensure your own safety as per the many HC rules and court cases that have been posted in previous pages.
If this collision had happened after the point where this road officially becomes two lanes in that direction then I would, of course, place 100% of the blame on the Passat driver. But it did not, it happened in the one lane section.0 -
Is it really reasonable to expect someone to create a second lane where none actually exists?
It's fine to do that if you can get away with it, but the onus is on you to ensure your own safety as per the many HC rules and court cases that have been posted in previous pages.
If this collision had happened after the point where this road officially becomes two lanes in that direction then I would, of course, place 100% of the blame on the Passat driver. But it did not, it happened in the one lane section.
It is quite legal for two vehicles to drive side by side as long as there is room to do so. In this case there was plenty of room to do so.
The onus is not on the motorcyclist, it is on the car pulling out to take due care and attention for other road users....he didn't!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards