We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ParcelForce Clearance Fee

2456711

Comments

  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Surely the onus is on you to familiarise yourself with issues surrounding the importation of goods to your own country rather than everybody else educating you?
  • System
    System Posts: 178,367 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Its not parcelforces job to tell you how best to process an import. You bought the parcel from America it was your job to tell the seller if you wanted special instructions added to the parcel.

    Although as a side I agree with you. I think parcel clearing fees are a massively overpriced. The Royal Mail one annoys me alot.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • mazza111
    mazza111 Posts: 6,327 Forumite

    If the seller had written on the customs form “goods to be customs cleared by importer” customs would have sent me an invoice then the parcel would have been released without a £13.50 fee, however i didn’t know that until a few days ago. And parcel force don’t make that clear, it’s almost like parcel force want to pay the Import VAT so they can charge an extortionate rate.


    As stated above I don’t need to travel to deal with customs, and Parcelforce have already been paid to deliver my item, the clearance fee has nothing to do with delivery.


    As the law changed in October 2011 the other threads are out dated hence I made anew one


    Hell no, and im going to add what does that have to do with the clearance fee, it's Parcelforce my gripe is with not customs.

    Am I really one of the few people on here that thinks it’s unreasonable to charge me an astronomical greatly disproportional fee for a servicethat I DIDN’T NEED, want or ask for?


    So at the end of the day. You were willing to take the chance, by not declaring your own customs. If you had done that in the first place, you would have got a customs charge without the courier charge.

    You took the chance, customs caught it. PF fee enabled.


    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/592233 Started in 2007 - 2012

    Same of the same :)
    4 Stones and 0 pounds or 25.4kg lighter :j
  • So at the end of the day. You were willing to take the chance, by not declaring your own customs. If you had done that in the first place, you would have got a customs charge without the courier charge.

    What are you on about? The customs form on the front of the parcel states the value of the item as plain as day, customs then looked at it,figure out the import tax (thats how it's done) and billed someone. Had customs somehow missed it and my parcel had slipped through the net without being billed of course I wouldn’thave phoned them up and told them, but that’s a different matter altogether. At no point in time was I trying to avoid import tax, as far as I’m aware everything was done right on the other end.

    Everything was done right, then Parcelforce decided to pay my bill for me and charge me for it.
    Personally I don't see the difference between this and the people in Paris that come up to you tie a not very good bracelet to your am then tell you, you have to buy it.
  • mazza111
    mazza111 Posts: 6,327 Forumite
    But that's the joy of importing goods. You should have looked into it before importing. 99% of courier firms charge for this. The only way around it is to deal with customs BEFORE the event of importing.
    4 Stones and 0 pounds or 25.4kg lighter :j
  • mazza111 wrote: »
    But that's the joy of importing goods. You should have looked into it before importing. 99% of courier firms charge for this. The only way around it is to deal with customs BEFORE the event of importing.

    But there is no way of paying the import tax in advanced with the exception of a few companies that have a special deal with customs. As far as I can tell the only way to avoid this fee is to put “goods to be customs cleared by importer” then deal with customs yourself. Had Parcelforce decided maybeI would like to do this and not pay a clearance fee I would have no objectionsto them charging whatever they want, but I’d have liked the option to not use this “service”.
    Which in the age of "consumer choice" i feel like I should have been given.
  • visidigi
    visidigi Posts: 6,605 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mazza111 wrote: »
    But that's the joy of importing goods. You should have looked into it before importing. 99% of courier firms charge for this. The only way around it is to deal with customs BEFORE the event of importing.

    Not true. The OP is right, if the sender had put the declaration on the package they could have self cleared - because they haven't it wasn't and they can't retrospectively apply to do so.

    The Parcelforce fee covers the process of Customs clearance (Parcelforce pay for Customs people to be at thier hub to clear freight quickly). This costs, as does examinations and repacking.

    If you do self clear you are sent the paperwork to complete for delivery, which is then sent back, assessed for charges, you are then mailed back and you can then arrange to pay the fees.

    If an item comes in Parcelforce that's due to an express services being used for import (USPS Express mail for example) or a high value good, otherwise it comes in royal mail where the fee is £8ish.

    The problem with self clearance is time, it could take weeks/months for the package to clear.

    Couriers have these systems setup to be quick, that's why people pay the premium for the convenience. Self clear might look cost effective from the outside, but my time is easily worth the £13.50 to avoid three weeks+ of paperwork and filing.
  • mazza111
    mazza111 Posts: 6,327 Forumite
    visidigi wrote: »
    Not true. The OP is right, if the sender had put the declaration on the package they could have self cleared - because they haven't it wasn't and they can't retrospectively apply to do so.

    The Parcelforce fee covers the process of Customs clearance (Parcelforce pay for Customs people to be at thier hub to clear freight quickly). This costs, as does examinations and repacking.

    If you do self clear you are sent the paperwork to complete for delivery, which is then sent back, assessed for charges, you are then mailed back and you can then arrange to pay the fees.

    If an item comes in Parcelforce that's due to an express services being used for import (USPS Express mail for example) or a high value good, otherwise it comes in royal mail where the fee is £8ish.

    The problem with self clearance is time, it could take weeks/months for the package to clear.

    Couriers have these systems setup to be quick, that's why people pay the premium for the convenience. Self clear might look cost effective from the outside, but my time is easily worth the £13.50 to avoid three weeks+ of paperwork and filing.

    And the buyer has to request that of the seller.....

    Sellers won't do that off their own back because as you say it does hold things up.
    4 Stones and 0 pounds or 25.4kg lighter :j
  • visidigi
    visidigi Posts: 6,605 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    But there is no way of paying the import tax in advanced with the exception of a few companies that have a special deal with customs. As far as I can tell the only way to avoid this fee is to put “goods to be customs cleared by importer” then deal with customs yourself. Had Parcelforce decided maybeI would like to do this and not pay a clearance fee I would have no objectionsto them charging whatever they want, but I’d have liked the option to not use this “service”.
    Which in the age of "consumer choice" i feel like I should have been given.

    The service right is that of the person who contracts the service, that would be the sender.

    That sender was given the right to make the consumer choice, they didn't.

    As a un-contracted recipient you aren't entitled to the choice.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.