We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Mystery Shopping Thread 24 *PLEASE READ THE OP FIRST**PLEASE NO CLIENT NAMES OR FEES

Options
1383384386388389397

Comments

  • JohnnyG
    JohnnyG Posts: 583 Forumite
    Defo Douglas Stafford. Great blokes down at Pompey, excellent comms and always pay on time.
  • JohnnyG wrote: »
    Defo Douglas Stafford. Great blokes down at Pompey, excellent comms and always pay on time.

    Big vote from me as well for DS!
  • Ruby_Ruby
    Ruby_Ruby Posts: 277 Forumite
    First Tracking, not much work, but they always cause confusion :D
  • skivenov
    skivenov Posts: 2,204 Forumite
    Digressing. I know it may sound a little silly on the surface of things, but can anyone else see this requirement for private investigators to be licences inadvertantly affecting our trade? I think if the rules aren't written specifically around us, then we could legally be in a tricky situation in years to come.

    Try defining what methods a private investigator employs, then list it against the things that a mystery shopper does.
    Yes it's overwhelming, but what else can we do?
    Get jobs in offices and wake up for the morning commute?
  • skivenov
    skivenov Posts: 2,204 Forumite
    JohnnyG wrote: »
    Defo Douglas Stafford. Great blokes down at Pompey, excellent comms and always pay on time.

    Utterly. The only complaint that I could possibly make is that payment takes a while compared to most (end of next month), but it's always correct and on time and they're great people to deal with.
    Yes it's overwhelming, but what else can we do?
    Get jobs in offices and wake up for the morning commute?
  • whitelabel
    whitelabel Posts: 2,217 Forumite
    edited 31 July 2013 at 9:14PM
    skivenov wrote: »
    Digressing. I know it may sound a little silly on the surface of things, but can anyone else see this requirement for private investigators to be licences inadvertantly affecting our trade? I think if the rules aren't written specifically around us, then we could legally be in a tricky situation in years to come.

    Try defining what methods a private investigator employs, then list it against the things that a mystery shopper does.

    No we are fine as it's market research... and employees will have in contract's they will be Ms'd so they give consent by accepting the contract, direct from horses mouth of the sia...
    According to the Act you will need an SIA licence if you are involved in any surveillance, inquiries or investigations that are carried out for the purposes of obtaining information about a particular person or about the activities or whereabouts of a particular person; or if you are involved in obtaining information about the circumstances in which, or means by which, property has been lost or damaged.

    The following activities will not require a licence:

    activities exclusively for the purposes of market research;
    activities exclusively concerned with a credit check;
    professional activities of practising solicitors and Barristers;
    professional activities of practising accountants;
    professional activities of journalists and broadcasters;
    activities exclusively relating to reference to registers which are open to the public; registers or records to which a person has a right of access; and published works;
    activities carried out with the knowledge or consent of the subject of the investigation.
    Schedule 2, paragraph 4 of the Private Security Industry Act 2001 (as amended) provides full details of non-licensable activity.
  • JohnnyG
    JohnnyG Posts: 583 Forumite
    skivenov wrote: »
    Try defining what methods a private investigator employs, then list it against the things that a mystery shopper does.

    I'd like to think we don't illegally hack mobile phone voice messages, answer machine phone messages, etc ;)
  • skivenov
    skivenov Posts: 2,204 Forumite
    Cheers Whitelabel, there's a load off if they keep it that way.

    Jonny - True, but then they don't either, well not officially, so they have no licence to do those things which are illegal. We use hidden cameras, interview people under false pretences, record phone conversations without notifying the other party, report on people who don't know that they're being observed....
    Yes it's overwhelming, but what else can we do?
    Get jobs in offices and wake up for the morning commute?
  • whitelabel
    whitelabel Posts: 2,217 Forumite
    skivenov wrote: »
    Cheers Whitelabel, there's a load off if they keep it that way.

    Jonny - True, but then they don't either, well not officially, so they have no licence to do those things which are illegal. We use hidden cameras, interview people under false pretences, record phone conversations without notifying the other party, report on people who don't know that they're being observed....

    as mentioned, other than for competitor visits, which has always been a grey area, employees will have given consent to be recorded, reported on, interviewed etc through their employee contracts...
  • enevel
    enevel Posts: 166 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    skivenov wrote: »
    Digressing. I know it may sound a little silly on the surface of things, but can anyone else see this requirement for private investigators to be licences inadvertantly affecting our trade? I think if the rules aren't written specifically around us, then we could legally be in a tricky situation in years to come.

    Try defining what methods a private investigator employs, then list it against the things that a mystery shopper does.

    Yup. And way beyond that. Journalists doing a proper job of keeping the government and big business in check will also be in the frame. Now why would a big-business-funded, incompetent, and morally bankrupt government have any interest in seizing a modicum of tangentially-linked public outrage to outlaw such things? Eh?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.