We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Facing possible dismissal.
Comments
-
pickpocketlocket wrote: »You have no idea of how employment tribunals work, including the standard of proof required. I don't know why you keep commenting on things that you do not understand? You are wasting peoples time, and your own!
I fully understand, that's the point.
Instead of posting nothing adding to the thread, way not either try and add something useful or be quiet.0 -
OP - why do you think that you will be sacked over and above the other 3 who did handle the money/have access to it?If you haven't got it - please don't flaunt it. TIA.0
-
I fully understand, that's the point.
Instead of posting nothing adding to the thread, way not either try and add something useful or be quiet.
I have explained how the law applies to this scenario. You first tried to say that the law does not apply( :rotfl: ), and then when corrected on that, you tried to apply the law incorrectly.
Again, why waste your time talking rubbish? You are not helping the OP!0 -
pickpocketlocket wrote: »I have explained how the law applies to this scenario. You first tried to say that the law does not apply( :rotfl: ), and then when corrected on that, you tried to apply the law incorrectly.
Again, why waste your time talking rubbish? You are not helping the OP!
You clearly can't follow an argument, you see I'm correct but can only post daft comments, not hard to see who is wasting their time here.0 -
-
pickpocketlocket wrote: »Summed up perfectly!
Thank you for seeing it my way, I knew you would.0 -
-
pickpocketlocket wrote: »Yes, I agree that you only post daft comments.
so now you don't agree? make your mind up.0 -
so now you don't agree? make your mind up.
You clearly can't remember what you wrote! Here, I'll remind you:You clearly can't follow an argument, you see I'm correct but can only post daft comments, not hard to see who is wasting their time here.
Yes, I agree that you can only post daft comments.
0 -
I have just rang a friend who works in a court and he says I am correct, all the cases he has heard has found for the employee.
I knew I was correct but it's good to get someone that works in a court to confirm it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards