We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is on-line banking safe?
Comments
-
Based on the number of digits on my account there is scope for 100 million account numbers and 1 million sort codes, so somehow there should be room for 100 trillion combinations or 100E12
Since there are 7E9 people living today, that is 14,286 combinations available per person, or 14 286 to 1 chance of a identical duplicate combination, if everyone had one account! Only if the numbers were purely random though, which of course they won't be!
I can't find any evidence of another bank other than my branch with my sort code. Perhaps it should be standard policy for banks to issue unique international sort codes?0 -
Like everything - It's only as safe as the Numpty using it :rotfl:0
-
Simple answer, I use the paying in book at the branch. It is read by the machine.I hvae nt snept th lst fw mntes writg ths post fr yu t cme alng hre nd agre wth m!
Cheers! :beer::beer::beer::beer::beer:0 -
Like everything - It's only as safe as the Numpty using it :rotfl:
Correct!
If you walk around a supermarket with your handbag unzipped then don't be totally shocked if you have your purse stolen. Or if you have your wallet hanging out your bag pocket.
You would not give anyone your door keys, car keys etc so in the same stance you would not give anyone your online banking details.0 -
if you type the correct sort code but the wrong a/c then then it will depend upon how many a/cs codes that particular sort has associated with it..
as a/c numbers are 8 digit long that means there are 99,000,000 possible combinations; however i've no idea how many are actually allocated.
the probability of the number being valid depends both upon the number allocated and on the number of mistakes actually made.
To reduce the odds of matching a wrong number to say 1 in a million, we would need enough digits to accommodate all the accounts, plus an extra 6.
Instead of the brute force approach, another way is to use some psychology to avoid the most common errors. E.g. you select numbers so that swapping two adjacent digits doesn't produce another valid number.
However, phone numbers and bank accounts aren't allocated in any intelligent way. Why are we not surprised."It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis0 -
What is the guarantee that these same people will not perform the same mistake when using a pay-in slip at the bank's counter ?
I really do not think there is a problem here.
The banks would have had enough thought process behind the margin of errors and the percentage of people falling into that bracket when using online payments .
This news article is cherry picking a really teeny weeny fraction of people - of course it is daily mail !.
My view is, if someone cannot type in 6 + 8 digits correctly and verify the authencity of receiver details by double checking it before clicking the "submit" button- they shouldn't be even in the news ! ..and yes, IB for sure is not for them!0 -
Transferring payments to someone via FPS is there purely as a convenience thing, if you can't trust yourself to do it properly then do it the old fashioned way and send a cheque!
Likewise, if you ask a cashier to make a payment and give the wrong details, the same thing will happen.
It's just typical news/media crap blown out of all proportion.
Whenever I've setup a new payment, I enter and then check all the details, click 'Next', and then check the details a second time before clicking the OK button. Even then, I still send a £1 test payment to make sure it gets there. It's not RS.0 -
Perhaps the gutter press assume people are as careless with internet banking as with voice-mail security.0
-
It's August. It's called silly season for a reason.0
-
I don't understand the fascination with sort codes, isn't it easier to just say that UK bank accout numbers are 14 digits long?
We break them up into 6+8 to make it easier for humans to process and remember, but imagine how many keystrokes are wasted every day by people having to press Tab twice to enter sort codes in groups of 2 digits
I have done an FP into an account which did not exist (because it had not been fully opened yet), and it bounced back to my account immediately.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards