PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

What type of agreement AST/lodger?

If I were to rent out 2 rooms in my flat to fellow students / friends of mine what contract would I have to use? Would it be lodger or a AST or a General one?

I would be living there but their rooms would have locks on the door.
Would I need to get special insurance for this?
«1

Comments

  • Hump
    Hump Posts: 519 Forumite
    edited 13 August 2012 at 11:07PM
    You would be a resident landlord meaning you would have lodgers of which there are several reasonable agreements available to use (readily available from stationers/ online).

    With respect to insurance - you are likely to have to declare this to your insurance company and they will likely charge you more.

    Also remember that whilst the 'rent a room scheme' allows a certain rental income from lodgers 'tax free', having 2 lodgers will almost certainly push you over the limit and you will need to contact the 'tax man' .....

    see https://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/151564.pdf
  • the-mango
    the-mango Posts: 818 Forumite
    Xmas Saver! I've been Money Tipped!
    As students don't normally have lodger agreements would I be able to give them an AST instead?
  • the-mango
    the-mango Posts: 818 Forumite
    Xmas Saver! I've been Money Tipped!
    wrote:
    1.3 How exactly is a landlord considered to be
    ‘resident’ in law? Does it make a difference
    if I don’t live in the property all the time?
    For lettings started from 15 January 1989, the
    important point is whether you are using the
    property as an only or principal home, both at the
    start of the letting and throughout it.
    It is accepted that, for short periods, a landlord may
    not live in the property yet still be considered to be
    resident: so long as he or she intends to return and
    this is apparent, for example if he or she has left
    belongings. However, only a court can say for
    certain whether a landlord has maintained enough
    residence in the property to count as a resident
    landlord: if not, then it is possible that the letting
    arrangement may be deemed to have become a
    regulated or assured tenancy, depending whether
    it first began before or from 15 January 1989. The
    definition of ‘residence’ for determining how the
    landlord must give notice or can evict an occupier is
    slightly different (see section 1.4).

    Also, I won't live there all year, only for about 24 weeks, maybe a bit more.
  • the-mango wrote: »
    As students don't normally have lodger agreements would I be able to give them an AST instead?

    My understanding is that if you are a live-in landlord then your tenants are considered 'excluded occupiers' - this basically means your tenants have very few rights but I also believe that you can't give them an AST contract.
  • jamie11
    jamie11 Posts: 4,436 Forumite
    the-mango wrote: »
    Also, I won't live there all year, only for about 24 weeks, maybe a bit more.

    How are you going to be able to say this is your principal home if you are there less than half a year?

    You may inadvertently grant AST's to your lodgers, that would mean you having all the responsibilities for doing the necessary things and it would be more difficult to evict them if needed.
  • the-mango
    the-mango Posts: 818 Forumite
    Xmas Saver! I've been Money Tipped!
    jamie11 wrote: »
    How are you going to be able to say this is your principal home if you are there less than half a year?

    You may inadvertently grant AST's to your lodgers, that would mean you having all the responsibilities for doing the necessary things and it would be more difficult to evict them if needed.
    I doubt they will be difficult to evict as they will be students who are moving on anyway.
    I could live there for longer if that would uncomplicate things.
    Does that mean if they are lodgers I don't need to get things like landlord insurance and stuff?
  • vuvuzela
    vuvuzela Posts: 3,648 Forumite
    the-mango wrote: »
    I doubt they will be difficult to evict as they will be students who are moving on anyway.
    I could live there for longer if that would uncomplicate things.
    Does that mean if they are lodgers I don't need to get things like landlord insurance and stuff?

    The point is, if you give them AST rights, then things could get very difficult if they refuse to leave when you want them to.
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 14 August 2012 at 11:56AM
    the-mango wrote: »
    Does that mean if they are lodgers I don't need to get things like landlord insurance and stuff?
    depends on the attitude of your insurance company , some will allow 2 lodgers, many won't

    you will still have to meet the gas safety certficate requirmeent whether they be a lodger or tenant

    BTW is this the property that your father will own as per your other thread, if so then you left out some rather important comments like the fact you will only be there part time so they may not be your lodgers at all but would be your father's tenants
  • Yorkie1
    Yorkie1 Posts: 11,893 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I am concerned by the reference to them having locks on their doors. If you do not retain a right to enter the rooms at will, then they have exclusive use of the room and I think you do indeed risk creating an AST for that part of the property.

    The fact that you live there less than half the year also raises a concern, mentioned by jamie11, that you inadvertently create an AST irrespective of room locks.

    The reference to 2 lodgers also raises a question as to whether you would become a House in (of?) Multiple Occupation, with potentially additional issues to comply with.
  • the-mango
    the-mango Posts: 818 Forumite
    Xmas Saver! I've been Money Tipped!
    I've checked and it won't be a HMO.
    Although the property will not be owned by me I will be the one in charge of letting it so all that wil be in my name.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.