We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House prices suffer biggest drop since 2009 - Nationwide -2.6%
Comments
-
Mr._Pricklepants wrote: »...and as predicted by Renoman, his sockie miraculously shows up...
Closely followed by a Prickinpants
0 -
RenovationMan wrote: »I keep asking this Graham and you keep avoiding it, is my statement above wrong?
You can keep asking the same question as many times as you like with your various sockies, but the answer is always the same and it's always right. Someone who bought a year ago will be 4% further on in their mortgage than someone who bought today. Simples.
depends. if the person who delayed buying for a year had saved money as a result they may be able to pay off the mortgage in 24 years.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »depends. if the person who delayed buying for a year had saved money as a result they may be able to pay off the mortgage in 24 years.
More likely that their mortgage is cheaper than their rent if they lived in a comparable property. It's a moot point anyway because no FTBer would get a 24 year term instead of 25.0 -
It's not really a moot point though is it, unless you think FTBs aren't allowed to make overpayments...
I think we can all agree that after 1 year of a 25 year mortgage, 1 year will have elapsed in time.
Beyond that, it's impossible to say whether that means a particular mortgagee (or even an average mortgaged) will be better off in a year's time for having taken out the mortgage today ago...0 -
Of course, but what is less certain is what people will do with the money in the meantime.I think we can all agree that after 1 year of a 25 year mortgage, 1 year will have elapsed in time.
Let's suppose that someone lives with parents for free during that year, so their rent or mortgage payments are available.
I'm sure we would all agree that some people will sensibly put the money that they would have spent on a mortgage/rent aside.
Others will spend it down the pub, on the horses, on a gambling site, on frothy coffees. Whatever they spend it on doesn't matter, but we all know that some people would just spend it.
I believe very strongly that earmarking money can make a massive difference.
So if we exclude the disciplined who can manage their money, the majority who are undisciplined will on the whole be better off with a repayment mortgage. They would be even more better off with a pension that comes out of their salary before they receive it.
Over 20, 30, 40 or 50 years this can make a massive difference which is hard to overplay. For example it could be a whole house after 25 years and yes that can be frittered away on frothy coffees, betting shop, pub etc.
I do actually know people who put off starting a pension.
Those who started have 6 figure sums 20 years later.
The people who didn't start do no have 6 figure sums, they have just spent it.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »It's not really a moot point though is it, unless you think FTBs aren't allowed to make overpayments...
I think we can all agree that after 1 year of a 25 year mortgage, 1 year will have elapsed in time.
Beyond that, it's impossible to say whether that means a particular mortgagee (or even an average mortgaged) will be better off in a year's time for having taken out the mortgage today ago...
Well it is a moot point if you think that FTBers aren't allowed to make overpayments, but renters are allowed to increase their deposits.
MOOT MOOT MOOT.
0 -
RenovationMan wrote: »Well it is a moot point if you think that FTBers aren't allowed to make overpayments, but renters are allowed to increase their deposits.
MOOT MOOT MOOT.
Ah classic Renoman childishly posting silly pictures.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »Ah classic Renoman childishly posting silly pictures.
I love brit1234's pictures.0 -
I hope so to, but im not holding my breath.
Classic Dan: pretending he wants house prices to fall.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »Ah classic Renoman childishly posting silly pictures.
They complement his silly posts rather well, I feel.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards