PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Breach of covenant & indemnity insurance when selling property?

We are in the final stages (so we thought!) of selling our house and our buyers solicitor has just picked up a breach of covenant relating to an extension we had built 2 years ago for which we should have gained consent from original developers for alterations to the property. We didnt realise this covenant existed and the company who built the house is now dormant on the companies house register so Im not sure how much luck we would have lifting the covenant. Plus 90% of the properties on our road have already had the same work done....
Anyway, my question is this - our solicitor has suggested indemnity insurance as an alternative, provided our buyers solicitor is happy with it. Is it normal that this would be an acceptable alternative?? Unfortunately buyers solicitor is away today so we are having to wait for a response. We were hoping to exchange next week so this is a real pain we could do without :( Any experiences gratefully received thank you!

Comments

  • go_cat
    go_cat Posts: 2,509 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    We ended up buying indemnity insurance as our new house had a conservatory which breached a covenant,just protects us if the builder challenges it even though they were bought out by another builder.

    Also to point our my solicitor would not exchange until this had been sorted.

    And yes the vendor should have bought it as they messed up by building it before the 5 year covenant was up, but they refused and I didn't want to lose the house so close to exchange
  • go_cat
    go_cat Posts: 2,509 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    Also to point our if the builder is or was aware the covenant was breached then any indemnity insurance would not be valid
  • phoebe1989seb
    phoebe1989seb Posts: 4,452 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    We also had to go down the indemnity insurance route when we were selling our (non-listed) Tudor house with 1930s extensions last year that had been subject to a conservatory being built about 15 years before we had purchased the property in 2007.

    There was a restrictive covenant dating from the 1930s - which was when the old Tudor building had been carefully removed from its former site and rebuilt several miles away - stating that permission had to be sought from the original vendor of the land before any extensions such as conservatories were added.

    Our buyers were happy to go with this, although we were a bit miffed that our solicitor hadn't spotted this when we bought the house three years previously and also as we felt it unlikely that the descendants of the original owner of the plot would be concerned - especially as virtually every other house on the same estate had also been extended (and sold several times) over the intervening years :o However, we thought it advisable to do this rather than risk losing our sale!
    Mortgage-free for fourteen years!

    Over £40,000 mis-sold PPI reclaimed
  • shiny76
    shiny76 Posts: 548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    SNIC wrote: »
    Is it normal that this would be an acceptable alternative??
    Yes. Happened to us. We had to buy an indemnity policy, cost approx £180. Buyers solicitor perfectly happy with it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.