We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Points
In my search for insurance many insurers are asking for details of any endorsements in the last 5 years.. although the points are removed from the license after 4 years (for most minor endorsements that is).
So why ask for 5 years history and not 4? Can they verify whether any points have been removed?
So why ask for 5 years history and not 4? Can they verify whether any points have been removed?
0
Comments
-
Points are removed from a point of view of 'totting up' so if you had nine and three expired you wouldn't get banned if you got three more.
However, the offence being committed doesn't expire and its used to calculate risk. The more points the riskier you are to insure, nothing more.
No comment on whether it makes too much difference to premiums though!
5t.What if there was no such thing as a rhetorical question?0 -
Even though the endorsement can be removed from your licence, it's still a matter of fact that you were convicted of the offence, and so the insurance company is entitled to ask you about it, and by not declaring it when asked you'd potentially be invalidating your cover, not to mention committing fraud.
The exception is when the offence becomes "spent". Under the Rehabilitaion of Offenders Act, convictions become spent after a certain length of time, and then do not have to be declared to insurers, employers etc, even if they ask. (There are exceptions for some jobs which require a high degree of trust, such as the police, or jobs which involve working with children). The length of time an offence takes to become spent does not depend on how long the points stay on your licence but rather on the other part of the penalty - for offences which attract a fine (ie 99% of motoring offences) the rehabilitation period is 5 years, and this is why most insurers ask about convictions in the last 5 years.
How easy it is in practice for an insurer to find out about points which have been removed from your licence I'm not sure - but presumably last year you told your insurer about them, and insurers do occasionally talk to each other...0 -
Have a look at Direct Line, I am about to renew a policy and it looks like they only go back 3 years. I was slightly surprised so will need to double check it again but perhaps worth a look.
Personally I think insurers are being a little disingenuous with their 5 years. Why don't they ask for 10 then they could ramp the premiums for many more folk.0 -
-
Why don't they ask for 10 then they could ramp the premiums for many more folk.
Because thanks to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, even if they asked, you wouldn't have to tell them. Apart from a very few circumstances, once the offence is rehabilitated (5 years for any sentence the law considers that you never done it guv
0 -
Thanks guys I didn't realise that. So they probably would ask for 10+ years if they could
0 -
(a) Because you would be entitled not to tell them about convictions more than 5 years old (unless you went to prison for them, or got some other unusual sentence with a rehabilitation period of more than 5 years) and (b) because even if you did tell them about spent convictions, they'd be in breach of their statutory duty if they charged you a higher premium because of them - at least that's how the Financial Ombudsman sees it.Why don't they ask for 10 then they could ramp the premiums for many more folk.0 -
Many used to ask about drink-driving convictions in the last 11 years (which is how long an alcohol related endorsement stays on your licence), but that seems to have stopped - see the link to the FO website in my post above.Thanks guys I didn't realise that. So they probably would ask for 10+ years if they could
Interestingly the rehabilitation period is halved where the offender is under 18 at the time of conviction, which means that a driver who is convicted as a seventeen year old can legally reply "no" to the question about convictions after two and a half years - even though he still has active points.
When the relevant provisions of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 are commenced, the rehabilitation period for most driving offences will drop to 12 months. I'm not sure whether there'll be an exemption for insurance companies, but I imagine they'll want one.0 -
Good thread this. I've learnt some stuff at least and I thought I was pretty au fait with it all!
5t.What if there was no such thing as a rhetorical question?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards