PPI Invalid letter of authority

roonaldo

ppidisgrace wrote: »

here's another example of bank dirty tricks
if the form of authority wasnt valid then how could they accept your instruction to investigate the claim
which you won

but they investigated anyway and ignored the CMC, so this was in the customers best interest. hardly a dirty trick.

Steamrunner

ppidisgrace wrote: »

here's another example of bank dirty tricks
if the form of authority wasnt valid then how could they accept your instruction to investigate the claim
which you won

How is this a dirty trick? The claim was lodged, the bank investigated - the bank is just querying the bit of the request where it says the CMC is to be involved. I suspect it's less to do with "customer's best interest" and more to do with not wanting to breach any data protection / privacy regulations, though...

Either way, not a dirty trick at all - this time!

dunstonh

Steamrunner wrote: »

How is this a dirty trick? The claim was lodged, the bank investigated - the bank is just querying the bit of the request where it says the CMC is to be involved. I suspect it's less to do with "customer's best interest" and more to do with not wanting to breach any data protection / privacy regulations, though...

Either way, not a dirty trick at all - this time!

It's a dirty trick in his eyes as he works for a claims company and the claims company in this case is being left out of the loop.

Anyone feeling sorry for the claims company? i doubt it.

[Deleted User]

dunstonh wrote: »

It's a dirty trick in his eyes as he works for a claims company and the claims company in this case is being left out of the loop.

It's a pity people are still engaging him, it just means there'll be another round of spamming from him at 2am tomorrow.

Steamrunner

Moneyineptitude wrote: »

It's a pity people are still engaging him, it just means there'll be another round of spamming from him at 2am tomorrow.

Yeah, just seen some of his other posts, my bad. On the plus side, he's giving a really good example of just why people shouldn't turn to a CMC for "help" - I believe the term is "Epic fail".

[Deleted User]

Steamrunner wrote: »

On the plus side, he's giving a really good example of just why people shouldn't turn to a CMC for "help" - I believe the term is "Epic fail".

I agree.:D

magpiecottage

dunstonh wrote: »

IAnyone feeling sorry for the claims company?

Almost as much as I feel sorry for Fred Goodwin and Bob Diamond.

burty8899

almost as much as i feel for ppidisgrace....;)

ppidisgrace

if your not accepting the authority then you dont have the authority to run a claim on behalf of somebody you dont have the authority from, not a dirty trick hahaha can tell you have financial backgrounds with your lack of clear talking

burty8899

ppidisgrace wrote: »

if your not accepting the authority then you dont have the authority to run a claim on behalf of somebody you dont have the authority from, not a dirty trick hahaha can tell you have financial backgrounds with your lack of clear talking

yeh cos thats about as clear as mud.....