We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Covering letter questions
Options

agrinnall
Posts: 23,344 Forumite

I'm applying for a job that asks for a CV and covering letter, and I have a couple of questions about the letter ettiquette that I thought the forum might be able to advise on. I'm hoping for a consensus but wouldn't be surprised to get a split decision.
1. The letter and CV are to go to HR, no contact name is given. In this situation Wikipedia's entry on salutations suggests either Dear Sir or Madam, or To Whom It May Concern. Which would you prefer?
2. The salary range for the job is slightly lower than my current salary. Should I mention my salary in the letter and explain why I would accept less, or should I leave any mention of money until interview, should I get one?
1. The letter and CV are to go to HR, no contact name is given. In this situation Wikipedia's entry on salutations suggests either Dear Sir or Madam, or To Whom It May Concern. Which would you prefer?
2. The salary range for the job is slightly lower than my current salary. Should I mention my salary in the letter and explain why I would accept less, or should I leave any mention of money until interview, should I get one?
0
Comments
-
"Dear Sir or Madam" and then signed off "yours faithfully".
Absolutely no mention of pay-scale whatsoever. That's not the purpose of the covering letter: it's to persuade the reader that you are an appropriate candidate for consideration. Some people never even get to the CV. Bad covering letter equals both in the bin.0 -
....
1. The letter and CV are to go to HR, no contact name is given. In this situation Wikipedia's entry on salutations suggests either Dear Sir or Madam, or To Whom It May Concern. Which would you prefer?
If you are writing to a named contact, eg Mr <X>, Recruitment Manager, ACME Corporation, it should be Dear Mr <X> because you are addressing him personally. If you are writing to an unnamed contact, eg For attention of Recruitment Manager, ACME Corporation, it should be Dear Sirs as you are addressing the company.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
DVardysShadow wrote: »IMO neither. I think that the Wikipedia advice is terrible.
If you are writing to a named contact, eg Mr <X>, Recruitment Manager, ACME Corporation, it should be Dear Mr <X> because you are addressing him personally. If you are writing to an unnamed contact, eg For attention of Recruitment Manager, ACME Corporation, it should be Dear Sirs as you are addressing the company.
Sounds a bit formal to me, and surely runs a small risk of the person reading the letter being a radical feminist who would bin it on principle (although I suppose the same might happen with Dear Sir or Madam because you'd put Sir first!).0 -
You do run the risk of the radical feminist. But she would be largely mistaken to rail at Dear Sirs. The 'Sirs' does not refer to any employee, but to the Directors of the company.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
As I suspected, views are polarised - a bit of Googling for Dear Sirs came up with 'experts' saying you definitely should use it and definitely shouldn't (and one who said Sirs should actually be sirs). It's a minefield!0
-
DVardysShadow wrote: »You do run the risk of the radical feminist. But she would be largely mistaken to rail at Dear Sirs. The 'Sirs' does not refer to any employee, but to the Directors of the company.
I agree. I address all of mine unless a name is given to 'Dear Sirs' so I am addressing the company. Then if I get any automated reply saying your email has been received you may have a name then going forward.0 -
Sounds a bit formal to me, and surely runs a small risk of the person reading the letter being a radical feminist who would bin it on principle
It could equally be post modern feminism, liberal feminism, socialist feminism dada dada - is it really necessary to turn a question re the format/ etiquette of a cover letter into sociology discussionDon’t be a can’t, be a can.0 -
Sounds a bit formal to me, and surely runs a small risk of the person reading the letter being a radical feminist who would bin it on principle (although I suppose the same might happen with Dear Sir or Madam because you'd put Sir first!).
Oh what a load of rubbish.
If they were a radical feminist, they wouldn't be a HR Manager. They would be at Greenham Common with their breasts out reading a Germaine Greere book.
'Dear Sirs' is simply business etiquette. There is always someone that has to go off at tangents.Eat vegetables and fear no creditors, rather than eat duck and hide.0 -
why not ring and ask for the name of the recruiting manager ?0
-
Oh what a load of rubbish.
If they were a radical feminist, they wouldn't be a HR Manager. They would be at Greenham Common with their breasts out reading a Germaine Greere book.
'Dear Sirs' is simply business etiquette. There is always someone that has to go off at tangents.
I think as it was my question I can use whatever geometrical devices I like without seeking permission from anyone else,0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards