📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New Passive Investor screwed by iii - where to transfer to?

Options
13»

Comments

  • jimmyjones_2
    jimmyjones_2 Posts: 106 Forumite
    Thanks for everyone's advice, especially Perelandra. I have decided to transfer to Cavendish Online, transferring as cash is mandatory. My forms are in the post.

    I have checked with iii and as long as they receive my transfer request before the end of the month and I transfer as cash, there will be no charge.

    Unfortunately I will be 'Out of the Market' for the duration of the transfer but that seemed preferable to paying 8% of my small pot in transfer fees. I will be gutted if the market rallies significantly in that period :)

    Since Cavendish haven't played their RDR hand yet I may have to switch again but I think I am moving to the best place for me right now.
  • Bertieburt
    Bertieburt Posts: 6 Forumite
    I am moving my iii ISA wrapped funds to bestinvest No Fee's and they will cover the iii exit fee (if there is one) up to £500.
    I already have one fund ISA with them so not sure if this is for exisiting customers only but worth a call to 020 7189 9988
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,754 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    that's interesting. why are they happy for dealing charges to vary?

    They are happy for all charges to vary. The FSA has said several times that it will not be telling firms what they can or cannot charge. It just wants to remove commissions and hidden payments.
    what about the interest that platforms make from cash deposits (on top of whatever they pay to the account holders, if anything)? does the FSA want this charge to be explicit, too? if not, why not?

    Commercial decision. Most platforms will pay interest on cash but will also charge against total amount on platform.
    are the costs to a platform for holding shares or funds very similar? (and what about for dealing shares or funds?) because if the costs are different, i don't see why the charges shouldn't be.

    Funds cost more than shares due to higher regulatory costs. Also, there are further FSA proposals which could raise costs. Such as reports having to be issued each year. KII have to be issued on each purchase shortly as well.

    Platforms have more costs than pure share dealing services.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.