We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Response from Steve Clark @ the BPA
Comments
-
supermoggy wrote: »Actually according to a PPC website, that was not the ruling at all:
combinedparkingsolutions.com/vcs.html
puts another viewpoint over anyway.
At least you've heard some good news this week Perky, about the scrapage of adding Vat onto Greggs products
.
Should save you some much needed pennies0 -
The contract proves what we have always known, item 15: The company shall not refund any parking charge.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
-
Look at item 14:
"Yes we will cancel the ticket if the client tells us to, but they will have to pay us £50 to do so"0 -
Is that a penalty charge then?I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
-
Look at item 14:
"Yes we will cancel the ticket if the client tells us to, but they will have to pay us £50 to do so"
Says it all really.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Look at item 14:
"Yes we will cancel the ticket if the client tells us to, but they will have to pay us £50 to do so"
Not quite. If cancelled within 14 days, no charge, 14-21 days client pays £20, more than 21 days client pays full cost of ticket. So the client has to act fast. But I wonder where the hapless motorist is directed to send their initial apppeal to, the client or the company? if the latter by not reacting quickly financial pressure could be applied on the client not to cancel."You should know not to believe everything in media & polls by now !"
John539 2-12-14 Post 150300 -
Says it all really.
I wonder how they will try and claim the money back from the client if they refuse to pay the charges.0 -
Perky will be going absolutely mad kicking empty cans of Skol round his bedsit as he knows the scam game which PPC's use to extort money out of people with their outright lies is now up.
Perky, you have lost and lost big time. You cannot fine anyone so just get that fact into your big fat head. Imbecile.0 -
Bloody Hell, he can't even spell 'Licence'.
Maybe he should have bought those exam papers.Je Suis Cecil.0 -
Coupon-mad wrote: »
BTW what is the Singh case? I have only seen the Ibbotson case this week?
Mr Singh was the barrister representing H.M. Revenue and Customs at the Upper Tribunal.
And did some PPC twerp appear and tell lies here and I missed it? Drat!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards