We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Parking Eye.....Again!

Sorry to bring this up again as it seems to always get the same response, but for my own piece of mind can you clarify my position?

My family and I overstayed in a carpark monitored by Parking Eye by a total of 17 minutes, as usual we think we have a valid reason for doing this. The first 30 minutes was free, signage was fairly obvious.

We received the usual letter: £60 charge going up to £90 then £120.

We appealed in the required time - it was rejected. We then asked what proof they wanted - no response! Then the £90 charge arrives today, along with a separate letter saying they have put the charge on hold to allow us to send in evidence.

Should we do as most people on here advise and ignore all correspondence and ride it out; or should we as others suggest offer to pay for the 17 minutes we overstayed by?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
«1

Comments

  • give_them_FA
    give_them_FA Posts: 2,998 Forumite
    edited 19 May 2012 at 2:07PM
    Ignore it mate, it is a total waste of time trying their appeal system, it is a sham. All they want is to establish a communication with you so they can browbeat you into paying when they send out their rejection letters. They have no interest whatever in the facts, why's or wherefores. All they are interested in is extracting money from you. Good job you came here before they succeeded.

    You mistook then for someone with honesty and integrity and played their game. Read around here and you will find all they are is money-grubbers trying to make a profit out of honest and trusting people.

    Bottom line, have no further communication with them, ignore them and anyone else that contacts you, and when they are finished with their preset chain of scary letters then they simply give up.

    But, how much would the 17 minutes have been? You could certainly offer that to the owner of the car park.
  • Stephen_Leak
    Stephen_Leak Posts: 8,762 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 25 May 2012 at 1:02PM
    Everyone likes to think that their case is unique but, for all intents and purposes, the circumstances are academic.

    Firstly, the legal stuff.

    Any warning signs are usually so badly positioned and worded, that they won’t have created a fair and legally binding deemed contract between the car park owner and the driver in the first place. (The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1997.)

    Even if there is a contract, all the car park owner can claim from the driver in damages for any breach of contract is what they’ve lost as a result. If this is a free car park or they paid, this is £0.00. By asking you for more, which is unreasonable, it’s become an unfair contract penalty, which is not legally enforceable. (Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. vs. New Garage & Motor Co. Ltd., House of Lords, 1914.)

    Under various legislation, only councils, the police, train operators and Transport for London can impose legally enforceable fines or penalties. Private parking companies can't.

    What do I do now?

    Don’t appeal. They always reject them. What’s in it for them to let anyone off?

    What’s in it for them is information. They need to know the identity of the driver of the vehicle involved at the time, because that’s who the alleged contract was with. If they don’t know who the driver was, they have to make do with chasing the registered keeper.

    With windscreen notices, an appeal letter will tell them your name and address, and maybe that you were driving at the time. If they don’t know who the driver was, they have to buy the details of registered keeper from the DVLA.

    With postal notices, they’ve done this already. But they still need to know the identity of the driver.

    They sometimes say that they have the right to ask for this information. This doesn’t mean that you have to tell them.

    However, even if you’ve written and confirmed who the driver was, it doesn’t make their actions any less unlawful. It just means that instead of unlawfully harassing the registered keeper, they can now unlawfully harass the driver.

    What will they do to me?

    They will send you a series of letters, then a debt collector and then a solicitor. The debt collector and solicitor are usually also the PPC, but using different headed paper. These will threaten you with all sorts of financial and legal unpleasantness, to intimidate you into paying.

    But, they can't actually do anything, for the same reason that a Nigerian e-mail scammer couldn't sue their victim if they didn’t pay.

    What should I do then?

    Continue to ignore everything you get from the PPC and their aliases. Yes, it does seem counter-intuitive to deal with something by ignoring it. Eventually, they will run out of empty threats to intimidate you with, and stop throwing good money after bad.
    The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force in my life. :)
  • Kite2010
    Kite2010 Posts: 4,311 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Home Insurance Hacker!
    The landowner has suffered a small loss (of whatever 17 minutes worth of parking is), which will most likely be pennies.

    Parking Pie are demanding a penalty which can be ignored.
  • Hutchy4
    Hutchy4 Posts: 2 Newbie
    Thanks for the advice. I will ride it out and post back what happens for other people's benefit.
  • Crabman
    Crabman Posts: 9,936 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Hutchy4 wrote: »
    Thanks for the advice. I will ride it out and post back what happens for other people's benefit.
    You can view our letter chain for Parking Eye so you know what to expect:

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2214803
  • I have the same letter Hutchy4...apparently over-stayed by 18 mins and now they want £90...£60 if paid within 13 days. hmm now how did I stay over the ticket time, as I am usually so acute on with car parking...ahh the car park I used is very busy, so spaces not always available, now where parking eye get you is...they photograph and give a time your car entered the car park say for example 3.15pm....you wait 15-20 minutes for a parking space...park your car, say at 3.30pm get a ticket for 2hrs and then leave at the time of your ticket which says 5.30pm... they photograph your car with the time you've left the car park at 5.30pm and therefore you've overstayed...because you entered at 3.15pm..same if you enter the car park, wait for a car parking space...give up 10 minutes later and leave...you have not purchased a ticket and therefore they fine you...has anyone else come across this problem with parking eye?....or are they just a bunch of scammers
  • ManxRed
    ManxRed Posts: 3,530 Forumite
    They do this a lot, have a wild guess what they do if you visit twice in one day?
    Je Suis Cecil.
  • give_them_FA
    give_them_FA Posts: 2,998 Forumite
    Well done, you have worked out the answer. Now you can get justice by simply ignoring their transparent attempt at a scam.
  • sunfairy
    sunfairy Posts: 1 Newbie
    edited 21 May 2012 at 3:02PM
    Thanks to everyone above for advice in similar situations.
    Parked over the 2-hour time limit in a supermarket car-park on Bank Holiday Monday - thinking that Sunday-rules would apply so I would be safe after the stated time limit. Have appealed to Parking Eye by email and am now worried that it was a mistake as they now know I've admitted it. However, reading these forums is encouraging - should I ignore further correspondence?
  • trisontana
    trisontana Posts: 9,472 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Of course. You situation is no different to the many others featured on here.
    What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.