We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Credit Card Cash Trick!
Options
Comments
-
Almost certainly such a transaction would conflict with the merchant agreement that the uncle has.
In theory it could trigger HMRC (income unaccounted for), VAT, or ML concerns but unlikely on this scale and all could be answered by suitable documentation.
So main concerns are: risk to uncle of breaking merchant agreement and getting caught and cost to uncle.
Better for uncle to lend nephew a few quid out of his pocket, for a 1% fee!0 -
Can't he just create account on netteller or moneybookers and then add funds by cc. They charge 1.5 to 1.9% fees respectively. And then withdraw funds to bank account.0
-
I know Neteller charge 1.75% deposit fee plus a 7.5E withdrawal fee.
Not really the interest free period the OP is looking for.0 -
Can't he just create account on netteller or moneybookers and then add funds by cc. They charge 1.5 to 1.9% fees respectively. And then withdraw funds to bank account.
Those transactions are treated as cash advances so you would pay interest from the day you made them. I suppose if your uncle owned an oyster top-up shop and you wanted £10, you could top up an oyster card and get it refunded at a tube station.. but larger amounts will take a few days and be sent by cheque.0 -
There's nothing dodgy or illegal about it
Do you have link e.g. an example merchant contract.
I've heard it's in breach of the merchant agreement between the merchant and mastercard/Visa.
Can you prove the statement above, with say a link or an extract from a contract?0 -
Do you have link e.g. an example merchant contract.
I've heard it's in breach of the merchant agreement between the merchant and mastercard/Visa.
Can you prove the statement above, with say a link or an extract from a contract?
But the fact is there are retailers who will give cashback on cards, both credit and debit. They're not going to risk breaking the law or getting their card facilities withdrawn for something which provides them very little benefit.
There could be merchants who do have agreements not to give cashback for whatever reason, eg increased risk of fraud, but it doesn't seem to apply across the board. There might also be limits, again I'm not sure.
Perhaps you could search for proof if you're that interested.0 -
You want me to prove a negative?
If should be totally clear what merchants can do under the agreement.
The law about VAT and mney laundering is pretty clear, otherwise criminals would work round the loopholes (people with access to muh more resources than jsut us).But the fact is there are retailers who will give cashback on cards, both credit and debit.
Are there others? or are they the only one.Perhaps you could search for proof if you're that interested.
I jsut wondered if you had access to the information as you seeemed to be stating authoritatively that it's not illegal without anything to back that up.
All the information I've seen on here before, it's generally agreed that it's not part of the merchant's agreement.
Whether the uncles wants to go ahead is up to him, but if it was a genuine "loophole" then I'm sure Martin would be recommending it or advertising it in his weekly emails.
It's clearly up to the individuals concerned but I think there are some doubts being raised on this.0 -
It may be that Wilkinson think of it like so:
They have a low percentage due to the amount of sales they have.
It's good customer service.
It offsets the cost to transport, insure and deposit the cash they would otherwise have to bank (may work out as 1% or so)0 -
It may be that Wilkinson think of it like so:
They have a low percentage due to the amount of sales they have.
It's good customer service.
It offsets the cost to transport, insure and deposit the cash they would otherwise have to bank (may work out as 1% or so)
Now THATS what you call clever thinking!
Totally agree with you mate!0 -
The law about VAT ... is pretty clear,
There are no issues here. There is no taxable supply for VAT purposes. The cash going out together with a matching credit card receipt (ie same amount from CC company) should demonstrate the nature of the transaction in the unlikely event it got queried.The law about .. money laundering is pretty clear,
Ha ha ha, I can assure you it isn't! But people really need to define their terms. Clearly we are NOT talking about drug money, terrorist finance, proceeds of crime etc. Ie there is no actual money laundering.
So the only issue is whether it could look that way to a MLRO (money laundering reporting officer), or someone else with reporting responsibilities. Well.. even assuming the uncle is running some kind of venture with enhanced responsibilities, (eg a bureau de change) then he won't be under any obligation because he "knows his customer". Perhaps his accountant might be suspicious - but unlikely if it is properly documented, particularly given the one-off and rather small amount. Finally what about the CC companies? Well, they will just see it as a purchase (from both the CC holder side and the merchant side). Not much suspicion there.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards