We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Boundary dispute, advice please.

Options
2

Comments

  • keystone
    keystone Posts: 10,916 Forumite
    LR plans won't fix the exact location of the boundary to better than 6 - 9 inches but as the strip you are talking about is a lot wider than that you should have a clue.

    Why not check the deeds for the property which will, no doubt, be in your possession?

    It strikes me as odd, though, that its taken 10 years for the penny to drop that your garden might be able to be 20% larger than it is so I'm wondering if there is more to this story than you are presently telling.

    The limitation period for adverse possession in England and Wales is 15 years so at ten you are well within it. But your neighbour can't claim adverse possession anyway unless they are actually using the land. Just passing over it once or twice a week doesn't consitute usage.

    Whilst you are getting a copy of your own plan from the LR get a copy of his too (for a further fee of course). You might find that the two are at odds with one another. Equally you might find that neither of you owns this land. In either case - let the fun commence.

    Cheers
    The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. - Einstein
  • paddy's_mum
    paddy's_mum Posts: 3,977 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    So many people have such faith in the Land Registry. However, LR themselves state that lines on the map (taken from the Ordnance Survey) are plus or minus one metre of accuracy! Not much use if it's only one foot of land that might be subject to dispute and/or alteration.

    Where LR can be extremely useful is in checking what conveyances, old deeds etc were lodged at the time of first registration of both properties which may give you some clues.

    It might also be of value to check with the previous owner/s and/or their family members as well as other neighbours to see if anyone can shed some light on the issue.

    My advice? Let it go unless it is vital to your use of your property AND you have unlimited tolerance of stress as well as deep pockets and a huge desire to fund the lifestyles of your solicitor, his favoured QC etc etc ....!
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 27 April 2012 at 1:03PM
    keystone wrote: »
    The limitation period for adverse possession in England and Wales is 15 years so at ten you are well within it. But your neighbour can't claim adverse possession anyway unless they are actually using the land. Just passing over it once or twice a week doesn't consitute usage.

    Whilst you are getting a copy of your own plan from the LR get a copy of his too (for a further fee of course). You might find that the two are at odds with one another. Equally you might find that neither of you owns this land. In either case - let the fun commence.

    Are you sure about the 15 years? If the neighbour had blocked off the area before Sideways bought it, he could have been in possession for many years. He doesn't have to have used the land - just prevented the owners of Sideway's property from using it.

    https://www.direct.gov.uk/en/HomeAndCommunity/BuyingAndSellingYourHome/Owningproperty/DG_196292
  • keystone
    keystone Posts: 10,916 Forumite
    edited 27 April 2012 at 6:07PM
    Mojisola wrote: »
    Are you sure about the 15 years?
    Yep.
    If the neighbour had blocked off the area before Sideways bought it, he could have been in possession for many years.
    Nobody has said anything about the neighbour "blocking off" the land. All the OP has said is that there is a hedge. So further questions arise. Who planted the hedge? Who maintains the hedge? How old is the hedge? Do the deeds of both properties include a provision of "right of access" for the neighbour over that strip of land?
    He doesn't have to have used the land - just prevented the owners of Sideway's property from using it.
    Actually yes he does have to use it and nothing has been said so far that actually confirms or otherwise that the neighbour himself has prevented the OP from having access.

    Cheers
    The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. - Einstein
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    keystone wrote: »
    Yep.

    Have you got a link to that?
  • keystone
    keystone Posts: 10,916 Forumite
    edited 27 April 2012 at 6:23PM
    Mojisola wrote: »
    Have you got a link to that?
    Not instantly but I'll go find you one.

    Cheers

    Edit: Land Registration Act 2002. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents

    and I'm sorry but I did get one thing wrong - failing memory in my dotage I suspect. It's 12 years not 15.
    The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. - Einstein
  • Norman_Castle
    Norman_Castle Posts: 11,871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    In short, our neighbour may have taken a strip off the bottom of our garden for his convenience.
    Would the previous owner have allowed this? Who planted the hedge?

    This may help http://www.boundary-problems.co.uk/boundary-problems/frontpage.html
  • Leif
    Leif Posts: 3,727 Forumite
    keystone wrote: »
    Yep.

    You might wish to read up on adverse possession. I have always assumed it is 12 years, having been involved in a boundary dispute myself:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_possession#England_and_Wales

    The neighbour might be able to argue that he/she has been using the land for a long time. Or they might have nicked it while your property was on the market, if for example it was a probate sale. It does happen.

    Added later: Just noticed that Keystone corrected himself.
    Warning: This forum may contain nuts.
  • keystone
    keystone Posts: 10,916 Forumite
    Leif wrote: »
    Added later: Just noticed that Keystone corrected himself.
    Well its nice to see that someone actually does read my ramblings. :D

    I invariably try to correct things if I've got them wrong. Old fashioned brain fade in this case.

    Cheers
    The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. - Einstein
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    keystone wrote: »
    Well its nice to see that someone actually does read my ramblings. :D

    I invariably try to correct things if I've got them wrong. Old fashioned brain fade in this case.

    Happens to us all!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.