Ministers To 'Approve Compulsory Water Meters'

Gothicfairy

kaya64 wrote: »

thank you , it won't happen though , but what i am saying is true you should research flouride and then you might understand why i refuse to be poisoned. Your choice i made mine

What will not happen ? Do you mean you are not quite brave enough to disconnect your supply and manage without running water all together ?

I do and it is not that hard if you try so maybe your attitude is more to do with paying the bill then the safety of the supply.

Gothicfairy

kaya64 wrote: »

I'm posting this information to save people being poisoned , if you are happy to drink the water then do carry on , but I am not and unless people refuse to be poisoned then people will die young of diseases which they would normally not get, including dimentia which you mentioned , so its obvious you know about the dangers but your decrediting what i say .
I am using the water supply and the drainage if i don't the whole street would be blocked, the drains are not my responsiblilty but i do have the right to refuse to pay for poisoned water .
i stopped smoking cigarettes because of the health dangers and realised i was paying to slowly kill myself , its now 22 years since i stopped smoking and my health is like an 18 year old and i am nearly 48 :j

So you are using the poisoned water and not paying for it....what an odd argument.
Just stop using the supply and that solves ALL your problems in one go and leaves your morals intact.

kaya64

bluewire wrote: »

What are you talking about......
1. Write a letter to your water comp and say that you would like to be disconected from the supply.....They will come out and turn off your water.

2. Have a septic tank installed and have your drains feed in to it.

3. Buy your water from a supermarket.

You are using something that you refuse to pay for....that to me is theft.:mad:

Which water company do you get your water from?? You are talking as is every company in the UK adds fluoride added to its water. Only a small number do and then it is not for the whole of their areas.
http://www.bfsweb.org/onemillion/09%20One%20in%20a%20Million%20-%20The%20Extent%20of%20Fluoridation.pdf

There has been no threat disconnection as yet , but you fail to see my point , I have every right to drink clean healthy water but the water offered is contaminated with flouride and other poisonous chemicals, so I have had to buy a system to clean it , if they can't do that I will , but i refuse to pay to be poisoned.

kaya64

Gothicfairy wrote: »

So you are using the poisoned water and not paying for it....what an odd argument.
Just stop using the supply and that solves ALL your problems in one go and leaves your morals intact.

it sovles nothing , if people do not stand up for their rights then it will stay the same, its you and others who are supporting poisoned water , I have said this before , research flouride .

kaya64

http://naturalsociety.com/water-fluoridation-persists-despite-being-unhealthy-for-infants/

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/9586203.MPs_debate_new_council_powers_over_fluoride/?action=complain&cid=10184887

Gothicfairy

kaya64 wrote: »

it sovles nothing , if people do not stand up for their rights then it will stay the same, its you and others who are supporting poisoned water , I have said this before , research flouride .

I am sorry but this is a daft argument.. Taking something without paying is theft and proves nothing, standing up for your rights and disconnecting the supply is at least honest.

I believe your issue is paying rather then using as clearly you are using their poisoned water...............what point are you then trying to make ?

SailorSam

kaya64 wrote: »

Because flouride is poison and water companies are forcing us to drink medicated water, until they take the flouride out I am not paying my bill and haven't paid since last November.
I don't mind paying for clean healthy water , but when they put poison in it I am going to pay them to kill me , who in the right mind would ?
besides water comes from the sky so its free and therefore should not be charged .

If you don't want all this unhealthy poison in your house there's a simple answer.
Go out into the street and turn it off, only use your rainwater, but i hope you're not planning on putting any waste in the pipes i'm paying for.

Gothicfairy

SailorSam wrote: »

If you don't want all this unhealthy poison in your house there's a simple answer.
Go out into the street and turn it off, only use your rainwater, but i hope you're not planning on putting any waste in the pipes i'm paying for.

They didn't seem to like that when I suggested disconnection .............wonder why.


I live without running water (unless I go and actually get it) and have done for a long time on and off..Still fighting fit and healthy, okay it takes more work but nothing I can't deal with.

kaya64

Gothicfairy wrote: »

I am sorry but this is a daft argument.. Taking something without paying is theft and proves nothing, standing up for your rights and disconnecting the supply is at least honest.

I believe your issue is paying rather then using as clearly you are using their poisoned water...............what point are you then trying to make ?

whatever you believe is your right, but I am not stealing water I am refusing to pay to be poisoned , I have made it clear to my water provider and they have done nothing to force me to pay, now this to me proves that they are deliberatley medicating my water supply with flouride, if you don't understand this then thats your problem.
http://www.ukcaf.org/european_court_ruling_spells_an_end_to_fluoridatio.html

antrobus

"Fluoride is naturally present in all water supplies at varying levels of concentration."

http://www.bma.org.uk/health_promotion_ethics/environmental_health/Fluoriwater.jsp