We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Tenants in common help needed!

2»

Comments

  • Thank you both for the advice. We have since emailed my the individual as to our intentions in such a way to 'sell it' to him as a viable and attractive offer that eliminates costs of high street estate agents. Hopefully this will lead to a negotiated agreement to have the house sold at a fair price where all parties walk away with the agreed % under the trust deeds.. Fundamentally this is what we all want, he is being particularly stubborn in wanting his 'friend' the estate agent to run the whole show (unfortunately this means really quick and really cheap sale, significantly affecting the other parties involved)

    I do not want to go to court what so ever, and the cost is ridiculous. I did seek legal advice and was informed
    a) do nothing and swallow having to pay his share of the mortgage for the next 12 years (not happy to do this, plus it prevents me moving on with my life AND the cheeky so and so can claim his full entitlement if the house is ever sold despite paying nothing!!)
    b) negotiate and put the house up for sale (trying to achieve this!)
    c) take out another mortgage/ borrow money to try and buy him out (financially crippling me)

    Taking on a lodger just doesnt work for us unfortunately.
    The reason this whole thing is such a mess is the individual is my brother whom in agreement with me agreed to help our mum out when she got divorced from my father. We took tenants in common agreement on a mortgage to keep the family home. Things turned bad with my brother, he moved out and stopped paying everything. My mum has a limited number of years to acquire a mortgage at a repayment level she could afford. Therefore she needs as much capital out of the house she has owned for nealry 30 years. He doesnt see it that way and is purposefully doing everything to either shift the house quickly or not negotiate in any reasonable way. I cant help despite earning a decent salary as Iv crippled myself with personal debt prior to the divorce happening. this is being paid off slowly but of course with my brother failing to meet his side of the mortgage, my debt is barely shifting.

    a mess. and a ridiculously long post. apologies :(
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    Does the trust deed not specify a remedy for resolving disputes... e.g. arbitration or appointment of an independant trustee.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • Unfortunately not, the trust deed is actually really vague for this particular area. It details the split of the house and the financials but nothing about if someone does not pay/ significant disputes. Really very very frustrating as we thought we had all angles covered, just didnt see this coming at all. Lesson learned. massively
  • Fire_Fox
    Fire_Fox Posts: 26,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 31 October 2012 at 1:03AM
    Small claims action in the county court for any missed payments up to a certain value is inexpensive and you can easily represent yourself. It's not court action like you imagine from the TV! Unless you are willing to take simply legal action like this you can't take anything off his share, it's only fair you both have your sides of the story heard.
    Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
  • Thanks Firefox, is it the case then that as he has not paid any % of the mortgage despite being on the trust deeds as an owner of the house with a share of ownership he could then be forced to pay what he has chosen not too? I accept the fact he wont be liable for council tax/utilities. I am also covering his life insurance (although at £12 p/month i think i will survive....)
    Just want him to agree to sale! Surely cant be that hard!!!!!!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.