Mystery Shopping Thread 23 *PLEASE READ THE OP FIRST**PLEASE NO CLIENT NAMES OR FEES

MysteryMe

Like I said, I am only going on what Ian from Gapbuster told me and it was a buy something for the full reimbursement amount or post a letter scenario. I could pay how I liked. All very odd. I've always posted a letter. Obviously if people have spent 50p on a pencil and not had it queried that's fine.

Workie_Ticket

Does anyone know if you can submit a PIP report the next day, or does it definitely have to be on the day?

N.I.M

Does anyone have an out of hours of Optimum Contact or are they office hours only?

whitelabel

samtastic7 wrote: »

Anyone doing merchandising for Tactical solutions I have 100's of vodka boxes but no info so not got a clue? supposed to done by tomorrow.

might want to remove the client name...

cant help with your question though

samtastic7

whitelabel wrote: »

might want to remove the client name...

cant help with your question though

Not mystery shopping merchandising you tell the store what your doing it promotes products

whitelabel

samtastic7 wrote: »

Not mystery shopping merchandising you tell the store what your doing it promotes products

but this thread says no client names for a reason, you tell the store, but not an open internet forum

other companies will know which companies have which clients and may approach them to steal business, confidentiality agreements are in place even for merchandising, for a reason

superliss

proshopper wrote: »

TG is right. There were always two types of jobs. The first is the proof of posting or spend up to £5 snd pay any way you like; for these you get back the full £5 reimbursement, no matter how much you spend (even if you spend nothing). The second type of job needs you to pay with a card (one of the specified cards) and you have to spend at least £5; for thes jobs you also get £5 reimbursed, but the assignment is invalid if you spend £4.99 or less.

I might be wrong but the specific card scenario was the same client inside a store rather than a stand alone. That scenario was quite long winded for gyp.

proshopper

superliss wrote: »

I might be wrong but the specific card scenario was the same client inside a store rather than a stand alone. That scenario was quite long winded for gyp.

I seem to recall those as well, Superliss, now you mention it! But there were certainly the two sorts that were the same client. The jobs with the minimum £5 spend as a card purchase were definitely for the store brand.

I notice that only the current ones (PoP or purchase) are covered in the Gyp orientation at the moment.

lclose62

Anyone doing the fizzy drink audits? I know there was an email sent out saying not to do them yet, has anyone had confirmation we can start tomorrow?

Stryder

Yummmmmmmm supermarkets on Gap for those who like