We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
claiming against importer.
Comments
-
Just a thorght - who did you buy it from?
Sometimes with large retailers with some products the importer and the retailer can be one and the same or just another arm of the same holding company.
Can you prove that the helicopter was faulty or sent back, do you have it as returned on a receipt or some paper work at all? RC helicopters usually cover themselves with all sorts of warnings on the helicopter and in the instruction booklet so id imagine it would be very difficult to claim but not impossiable.0 -
cindychops wrote: »i was not given any options regarding refund/replacement/getting the damaged goods back i just got a phone call saying they have helicopter for me to collect!no paper work signed.
Did you request the helicoptor back or just accept the replacement? Taking the new helicopter would be pretty much accepting it. Once you accepted the replacement the old helicoptor was no longer your property and you don't really have any say it what they do with it. If it was covered in blood etc though I can't see them keeping it for long.0 -
What is vague about asking if they had a right to destroy my property?CoolHotCold wrote: »If MSE has taught me anything, that asking very vague questions relating to personal injury is almost always either someone trying to hide something to obscure the facts so we only see their side, that or they really have nothing better to do then stir the pot.
Still, I answered the question, just predated it with a warning.0 -
cindychops wrote: »Thanks for all the replys,the helicopter spun up full speed when i was disconnecting the battery and was a problem with transmitter,it seems funny that it took them 2 weeks NOT to find a problem with it but as a goodwill gesture replace a £200 helicopter with a £400 one.
The last thing i wanted was another heli and would have been happy with a refund,i now have no way of proving the product was indeed faulty as it has been destroyed.
I just need to know if they are within their rights to have done that?
thanks again.
p.s. i'm not a troll.
How can you be sure the transmitter was at fault?
It may have been interferance from something else on a similar frequency.
How come you only got £150 for a brand new £400 model?
Was it an ebay auction (just curious)0 -
cindychops wrote: »What is vague about asking if they had a right to destroy my property?
But is that not the point? It was not your property, you accepted a replacement!0 -
I sold the heli on ebay and i even struggled to get £150 for it (they sell them at modelzone for £399.99 though)How can you be sure the transmitter was at fault?
It may have been interferance from something else on a similar frequency.
How come you only got £150 for a brand new £400 model?
Was it an ebay auction (just curious)
The tx was a 2.4ghz so interference was not to blame.0 -
OP, as has been said, you have no claim at all against the importer.
Any claim you may have is against the retailer.
Of course, if the retailer and imported are one and the same...
The importer did not destroy you property.
They replaced the original helicopter with another.
The original helicopter became their property when you accepted the replacement.0 -
Well I'm going to get this pun out of the way now.. so apologies now..
"So that's why they call 'em choppers"
*back to my day job*
:exclamatiTo the internet.. I need to complain about something!0 -
Thanks for clarifying that.OP, as has been said, you have no claim at all against the importer.
Any claim you may have is against the retailer.
Of course, if the retailer and imported are one and the same...
The importer did not destroy you property.
They replaced the original helicopter with another.
The original helicopter became their property when you accepted the replacement.0 -
cindychops wrote: »I sold the heli on ebay and i even struggled to get £150 for it (they sell them at modelzone for £399.99 though)
The tx was a 2.4ghz so interference was not to blame.
There are several things that could have affected it.
WIreless CCTV operates on that freq as well as some wireless tv extenders.
Not to mention yours and everyone elses wireless router.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards