PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

sold a business now being sued for misrepresenation

Hi
We sold our caravan site last year they did not have a survery done they are now sueing us for misrepresenation saying there were things about the plant?repairs to swimming pools and also Japenese not weed, also right down to the internet connection everything they say is my fault is anyone out there any advise or help as we need it. I think they did not have a survey deliberately so they could sue after.

Comments

  • Property is bought 'as seen' - the responsibility for making sure that it is in a suitable condition is the buyers - if they fail to have a survey carried out, they can't complain if they later find that there are problems and defects they were not aware of.

    You are not obliged to highlight bad features, defects or problems when selling property, it is up to the buyer to find them out for themselves and satisfy themselves as to the price to be paid for the property in the condition seen.

    You would only be responsible for misrepresentation if you provided false or misleading information about the state of the property or answered questions dishonestly.

    If you said nothing and they asked nothing, the condition of the property post-sale is down to your buyer.
  • courtjester im not too sure that your right there. I think the law changed a few years ago so that if you knew something onerous about your home you have to reveale it. like if you have subsidence 5 years ago for example, you have to inform a buyer, otherwise you could just plaster over cracks and then blame the buyers for not checking it out.

    not sure about the stuff mentioned above though as it seems like those items the buyers should have checked those out. let the buyer beware is a saying but wether that still holds true i am not too sure about.

    rich
  • prudryden
    prudryden Posts: 2,075 Forumite
    The Jester is correct. I imagine this is beyond the scope of your local small claims county court and you may need to engage your own solicitor. This would not be a do-it-yourself job.
    FREEDOM IS NOT FREE
  • courtjester im not too sure that your right there. I think the law changed a few years ago so that if you knew something onerous about your home you have to reveale it. like if you have subsidence 5 years ago for example, you have to inform a buyer, otherwise you could just plaster over cracks and then blame the buyers for not checking it out.

    rich

    rich, the law on property sales in the UK has not changed, it's still buyer beware. You may be thinking about recent 'Sale of Goods' legislation, but those parts relevant to second-hand goods or property sales are not different. There is no requirement that a property be 'fit for purpose' or of 'merchantable quality' - that only applies to retailers responsibility for new goods.

    You HAVE to answer any questions posed about the property honestly and can be sued for misrepresentation if you don't disclose information relevant to a specific question. But if the question is not asked you are NOT obliged to reveal anything about the property, even if you know about defects.

    The law in simple terms just states that you must not mislead a buyer.

    If you receive a questionnaire from the buyer's solicitor which asks "are you aware of any subsidence history", you must of course declare if you know of subsidence. But unlike an insurance proposal (which requires you to tell the underwriters about anything 'material' to the risk, even if they don't ask), when selling a home (or business) you are not legally obliged to offer any details that are not requested, you can simply stay shtumm. It's the same with estate agents.

    Saying "here's my property, do you want to buy it" is not misleading no matter how many problems you may be aware it has.
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,376 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    i would pass any mail from your buyers straight to the solicitor who handled your sale. Chances are they are just trying it on and one firmly worded letter from your solicitor will send them packing.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • brasso
    brasso Posts: 797 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    I'm not a lawyer but I'm pretty sure that it depends on whether you have misrepresented the situation or not. For instance if you told them that the swimming pool was serviced in the last 12 months and it hadn't, you could be liable. But if they never asked, and you never offered, any information about the swimming pool then I can't see that they have a case. It comes down to 'caveat emptor' - "buyer beware".

    Nip this in the bud. Go to see a solicitor and get some advice. I suspect that all it will require is a stiffly worded letter.
    "I don't mind if a chap talks rot. But I really must draw the line at utter rot." - PG Wodehouse
  • Thanks everyone I will seek advice
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.6K Life & Family
  • 256.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.