📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Royal Mail: "Computer says No"!

Hi

I scheduled a redelivery of a packet to my local post office via the Royal Mail website and printed out the online confirmation.

I went to pick it up today, but it wasn't there.

I tried calling the local sorting office but at the end of endless rings I was asked to key in my security number??, and was promptly cut off!!

When I called the redelivery helpline, I told the operator this and basically got "Computer says No"! response.....apparently I hadn't done a redelivery request for several months despite me reading out my recent printout of confirmation from their site. :mad:

They have arrange another redelivery, but I said I didn't want to pay the £1.50 pickup fee now as I had already made one trip and it was their mistake.........but again "Computer says No"!
:mad::mad::mad::mad:

Vigman
Any information given in my posts or replies is intended to be of interest and/or help to members of the forum. I cannot guarantee that this is accurate or up to date.
«1

Comments

  • Mupette
    Mupette Posts: 4,599 Forumite
    just to prepare you, you screwed up somewhere as our resident retired postman will soon inform you. :o
    GNU
    Terry Pratchett
    ((((Ripples))))
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    vigman wrote: »
    Hi

    I scheduled a redelivery of a packet to my local post office via the Royal Mail website and printed out the online confirmation.

    I went to pick it up today, but it wasn't there.

    I tried calling the local sorting office but at the end of endless rings I was asked to key in my security number??, and was promptly cut off!!

    When I called the redelivery helpline, I told the operator this and basically got "Computer says No"! response.....apparently I hadn't done a redelivery request for several months despite me reading out my recent printout of confirmation from their site. :mad:

    They have arrange another redelivery, but I said I didn't want to pay the £1.50 pickup fee now as I had already made one trip and it was their mistake.........but again "Computer says No"!
    :mad::mad::mad::mad:

    Vigman

    as for calling the delivery office (theres no such thing as a sorting office nowadays)
    well thats what happens when staff levels are cut.
    if its not on the main computer,then it can't be actioned by the delivery office.
    The £1.50 fee is payable to the Post Office. when the scan in a local collect item. their systems will update that £1.50 is due to be paid.
    you would need ot raise that compalint with RM after collecting the item,the Post Office has done nothing wrong.
    perhaps PM Muppet for advice next time,as she seems to have the answers.
    Mupette wrote: »
    just to prepare you, you screwed up somewhere as our resident retired postman will soon inform you. :o

    hopefully he will be along soon.
    rather than sniping at him. perhaps provide some relevant assistance
  • vigman
    vigman Posts: 1,384 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    It was the fact that I had a printout of the confirmation of re-delivery address and time from the website that really surprised me (as an ex-IT Manager!) that it did not then appear on the RM system.

    As a registered disabled person, any trip takes effort and more worryingly, if I was older and had not chased it up, my confirmation would have made me assume that it was at least in the system for local PO delivery.

    I am great friend with our local PO (as a frequent Ebay user) and also our local postie who was a colleague in another life and have no issue with them.

    I do have issue with a system that accepts a re-delivery request with a printed confirmation and the package is not there as agreed!!

    Vigman
    Any information given in my posts or replies is intended to be of interest and/or help to members of the forum. I cannot guarantee that this is accurate or up to date.
  • aldredd
    aldredd Posts: 925 Forumite
    vigman wrote: »
    that really surprised me (as an ex-IT Manager!) that it did not then appear on the RM system.

    As an ex IT Manager, I'd have thought you'd be the least surprised that sometimes things go wrong :huh:
  • Azari
    Azari Posts: 4,317 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    aldredd wrote: »
    As an ex IT Manager, I'd have thought you'd be the least surprised that sometimes things go wrong :huh:

    Not really.

    Systems are usually designed so that once information gets into the system it's safe. Thus if you get a printed confirmation the data it is based on should not vanish.

    The reason IT often fails is that it is designed to stop dead when anything happens that could create such an anomaly.

    To the layman it's all just IT failure, but some types of failure simply don't happen. (Barring catastrophic physical trauma to the equipment.)

    Have you ever, for example, heard of a bank 'losing' a deposit for which someone has a receipt?
    There are two types of people in the world: Those that can extrapolate information.
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    vigman wrote: »
    It was the fact that I had a printout of the confirmation of re-delivery address and time from the website that really surprised me (as an ex-IT Manager!) that it did not then appear on the RM system.

    As a registered disabled person, any trip takes effort and more worryingly, if I was older and had not chased it up, my confirmation would have made me assume that it was at least in the system for local PO delivery.

    I am great friend with our local PO (as a frequent Ebay user) and also our local postie who was a colleague in another life and have no issue with them.

    I do have issue with a system that accepts a re-delivery request with a printed confirmation and the package is not there as agreed!!

    Vigman

    well as has been publicised recently
    RM have had (more)issues with their site
    whether its connected or not I couldnt say
    likely though I suppose
  • Azari
    Azari Posts: 4,317 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    custardy wrote: »
    well as has been publicised recently
    RM have had (more)issues with their site
    whether its connected or not I couldnt say
    likely though I suppose

    Not really.

    More likely 'finger trouble', or miscommunication of access data.
    There are two types of people in the world: Those that can extrapolate information.
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Azari wrote: »
    Not really.

    More likely 'finger trouble', or miscommunication of access data.

    I dont know about either
    RMs software is a hotch potch
    systems that should be compatible arent
    Post Office systems not working with RM letters for example
    two different types of scanners in delivery offices,neither working together and yet neither can work exclusivly
  • aldredd
    aldredd Posts: 925 Forumite
    Azari wrote: »
    Not really.

    Systems are usually designed so that once information gets into the system it's safe. Thus if you get a printed confirmation the data it is based on should not vanish.

    The reason IT often fails is that it is designed to stop dead when anything happens that could create such an anomaly.

    To the layman it's all just IT failure, but some types of failure simply don't happen. (Barring catastrophic physical trauma to the equipment.)

    Have you ever, for example, heard of a bank 'losing' a deposit for which someone has a receipt?

    Oh, I've seen plenty of examples where data disappears from one place & mysteriously reappears in another (or not at all). Usually occurs when one systems has been bolted onto another, and then onto another etc - sometimes systems talk to each other in unexpected ways under unforeseen circumstances.
  • Mupette
    Mupette Posts: 4,599 Forumite
    custardy wrote: »
    perhaps PM Muppet for advice next time,as she seems to have the answers.

    hopefully he will be along soon.
    rather than sniping at him. perhaps provide some relevant assistance


    It cuts both ways, you have had a go at me so many times, pathetic really you started it, you finish it, grow up

    example see above your own post.
    GNU
    Terry Pratchett
    ((((Ripples))))
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.