We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
At last, the baby boomers will share the pain
Comments
-
Not if they cut the basic pension to a level where all that is affordable is a one way plane ticket to switzerland.0
-
'Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.'
GALATIANS 6: 7 (KJV)0 -
Regardless of the 1970's, which were a tough time,.it's noteworthy that some of the older people here criticise younger people for expecting an ever rising standard of living, when they've made sure that retirement is the cherry on the cake of theirs.0
-
I can't believe you are quoting an article with sob stories about £2 million+ house brigade

The property market is a pyramid. No single level functions without the other. There's correlation. So there's going to be a ripple through effect. Which may come as a shock to some people.0 -
ruggedtoast wrote: »Regardless of the 1970's, which were a tough time,.it's noteworthy that some of the older people here criticise younger people for expecting an ever rising standard of living, when they've made sure that retirement is the cherry on the cake of theirs.
Rubbish. Many older people are living on a pittance. Yes, there are people who have very high pensions – and anyone who receives a pension of more than £24,000 should be means tested. However, don't lump all pensioners in the same bracket.
Pensioners include many people who worked hard for 50 years or more (without the entitlements that younger people expect and receive courtesy of the taxpayer), but who were always on relatively low wages and therefore could not afford to save hundreds of thousands of pounds to provide them with a decent pension.0 -
baby boomers are generally considered to be people born between 1945 and 1965
so the oldest baby boomers are 67 and the youngest 47
I believe many of these people aren't pensioners
S**t! I've been wishing my parents dead because I thought they were greedy, scumbag, honey dipping boomers. Turns out they are pre-boomers (1944) - must be why they've only got a small house, no final salary pensions and 15 year old Vauxhall Corsa.
I still hate them. If they'd been born a year later they'd have a mansion, a Bentley and a massive pension income that I'd be able to get my hands on when they snuffed it.0 -
And that's what forty years of 'child-centred education' gets you.
That must be Biggles nicer brother
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Rubbish. Many older people are living on a pittance. Yes, there are people who have very high pensions – and anyone who receives a pension of more than £24,000 should be means tested. However, don't lump all pensioners in the same bracket.
Pensioners include many people who worked hard for 50 years or more (without the entitlements that younger people expect and receive courtesy of the taxpayer), but who were always on relatively low wages and therefore could not afford to save hundreds of thousands of pounds to provide them with a decent pension.
Other than pointing out that not everyone is rich I'm not sure what your point is.
People retiring now will get a better state funded retirement than those who are currently mid way through their working lives and having to pay for the former's benefits.
There are retirees now who through extraordinary bad luck or incredible ineptitude, are facing an assetless retirement on a state pension.
Anyone else who got round to buying any sort of property or signing on for a council house or their work's final salary pension scheme in the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's, or up to 2005 in the 00s, is quids in.
Sorry if a 45 year window wasn't long enough for you to get your act together, but there is nothing like that around now, nor is there likely to be again.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »The property market is a pyramid. No single level functions without the other. There's correlation. So there's going to be a ripple through effect. Which may come as a shock to some people.
I suggest that the pinprick at the top will have slightly less influence than the base
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards