We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Freeholder rejecting variation to lease

13»

Comments

  • System
    System Posts: 178,374 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    To be honest I don't think you can expect any freeholder to give carte blanche as your buyer seemed to want. They would always wanted some sort of check system in place since it's their building and including the requirement to ask was the answer.

    Yes, they may always say yes but at least they know what is happening with their building.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • richardw
    richardw Posts: 19,459 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Is the flat unsuitable for owner occupation?

    Is it only attractive to buy to let investors?
    Posts are not advice and must not be relied upon.
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    fannyanna wrote: »
    I can see what you're saying about the positives but to be honest that was always the situation and I feel as though we didn't need a deed to clarify the position. But you're right about going ahead with the deed. We're not getting our money back so rather than it being completely wasted it makes sense to get the deed..

    But having done so then why not complete it?

    As posted any sensible buyer is not going to say that they will buy with the promise that the landlord will give consent "anyway"; legally they can't!

    And bear in mind that "policy" may change, all it takes is a difficult tenant nearby and the landlord reviews that policy. The fact tehy said one thing and presumably on legal advice said another, is proof of that.

    I promise you you are adding value to your home by doing completing a deed on a right to let with consent.

    A buyer insisting on no restriction is relatively rare, even in the BTL brigade.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • fannyanna
    fannyanna Posts: 2,622 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    richardw wrote: »
    Is the flat unsuitable for owner occupation?

    Is it only attractive to buy to let investors?

    Not at all. It's just that we had an investor buyer.

    We had an offer from a first time buyer and we're now waiting to hear whether she's still interested.
    But having done so then why not complete it?

    As posted any sensible buyer is not going to say that they will buy with the promise that the landlord will give consent "anyway"; legally they can't!

    And bear in mind that "policy" may change, all it takes is a difficult tenant nearby and the landlord reviews that policy. The fact tehy said one thing and presumably on legal advice said another, is proof of that.

    I promise you you are adding value to your home by doing completing a deed on a right to let with consent.

    A buyer insisting on no restriction is relatively rare, even in the BTL brigade.

    That's what I said - that I would complete it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.