UKCPS parking ticket

Kite2010

Trebor16 wrote: »

Hasbeen seems to be issuing more claims of late, especially for those where the identity of the driver is not known. He must be getting desperate.

Issue 100 court cases, he only has to win 1 to jump up and down and use it for future reference, doesn't matter about losing the other 99.

give_them_FA

HO87 wrote: »

Or is PH just making a point? The Protection of Freedoms Bill is back in the Lords next week (12/03) for its third and final reading - last chance for any amendment. Could someone just be trying to reinforce the BPA's argument for the introduction of Clause 56?

Even if they can get round the issue of not proving who the driver is, they still have the problem of being tied to actual losses only (frequently zero) and not their imaginative fine or penalty.

notts_phil

Hasbeen has got a real fight on his hands over the next coming months.

I wonder how much time he Really spends on here.

Anyone got a photo of him so when I see him at court I can recognise him outside court and take some good photos?

taffy056

He's the one biting his nails

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_w-nMS7E_SaU/TRAXPq0HA1I/AAAAAAAAC20/APd2pdHlHcc/s1600/nail-biting-disease.jpg

Kite2010

I can see some more no-shows from Hasbeen as he rushes from various court to court trying to wipe the egg off his face when he loses

give_them_FA

Life of Brian, you just need to fill the paperwork in to acknowledge service and state you will be defending the whole claim. The defence can be kept as simple as saying that you were not driving the vehicle nor were you present at the time it was parked and that if the Claimant (UKCPS) contends otherwise then they are put to proof on the issue. They must prove you were driving or their claim will fail immediately. I hope you live a long way from Yorkshire as the matter will be transferred to your local court and I love the idea of Haswell having to go a lng way just to have his nose rubbed in the dirt when it gets chucked out- keep in touch. Under no circumstances give them a penny, it is yet another scam, this time abusing the process of the Courts.

The_Slithy_Tove

give_them_FA wrote: »

We need to get these linked up because the overall plan is to have UKCPS and Haswell declared vexatious litigants, for which they have been ticking all the boxes thus far.

Whose plan is it to get him declared a vexatious litigant? Is anyone actually coordinating such an effort, and how would the process work? Or can you not say on a forum he'll be reading?

give_them_FA

The_Slithy_Tove wrote: »

Whose plan is it to get him declared a vexatious litigant?

It appears to be his, to judge by his actions! :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

LincolnshireYokel

another set of court papers by UKCPS on pepipoo, however this site prevents me posting the link but its ?showtopic=69153

Kite2010

Is it just me whom thinks Hasbeen is trying for one last payday before retiring to a sunnier climate when he is banned from doing court as the money is drying up as people get more aware of the scam?