Land Registry - January up 1.1% mom

Jimmy_31

RenovationMan wrote: »

I merely asked you if you had stopped hanging around building sites and have now started hanging around schools as you suddenly gained an interest in women's school-run attire.

You haven't answered my question.

Yeah, i believe you.

RenovationMan

Jimmy_31 wrote: »

Yeah, i believe you.

You still haven't answered my question.

Here is a reminder:
Which town in the North West of England do you live in?

MrRee_2

He has indicated Manchester in some posts ....... maybe Wally Range or Moss-Side?

Jimmy_31

MrRee wrote: »

He has indicated Manchester in some posts ....... maybe Wally Range or Moss-Side?

Yeah i remember that post where i said i live over 30 miles away from manchester.

Percy1983

DaisyWheel wrote: »

Do you mean as in the way you did on at least three occasions over the last week?

You should rename yourself Pathetic1983

I can genuinely say that if you made this point after the first time I typed it then I would have modified it, I am sorry it caused you offence as it really wasn't intended that way to you or anybody else in rented accommodation.

After consideration a more thought out way of wording it would have been.

...As you keep referring to me as a mummies boy the only other option is to rent to which you will call me stupid for paying a landlords mortgage, so how can any young people win?...

There is nothing more I can do, I have been honest about the mistake and apologised, either let it go or add me to your ignore list.

RenovationMan

Jimmy_31 wrote: »

Yeah i remember that post where i said i live over 30 miles away from manchester.

You still haven't answered my question.

Jimmy_31

RenovationMan wrote: »

You still haven't answered my question.

What was the question again.

RenovationMan

Jimmy_31 wrote: »

What was the question again.

What town do you live in.

Graham_Devon

RenovationMan wrote: »

Getting back to our discussion, I'm sorry but I totally refuse to believe that any new house buyers actually want their largest investment and most expensive asset to lose money. That they actually state that they are happy for their family to be stuck in the misery of negative equity. That they actually say that they want to put their family's finances at risk so that strangers can buy the same house that they did, but for a much cheaper price. Sorry, but that's all just bollox.

Seems your problem is being unable to differenciate between "want" and "accept".

I've not seen anyone stating they implicitly want their house to fall in value. Accepting it however is a very very different thing. No doubt you will be off now suggesting wanting house prices to fall is wanting their house to fall in price. But I believe the way you explained it puts a completely different slant on what's being said..... a slant that's easy to dismiss and easy to dismiss someone elses arguments on.

Figure out the difference and you are half way to understanding what people are talking about.

RenovationMan

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Seems your problem is being unable to differenciate between "want" and "accept".

I've not seen anyone stating they implicitly want their house to fall in value. Accepting it however is a very very different thing.

Figure out the difference and you are half way to understanding what people are talking about.

You'retalking gibberish again Graham, yet somehow managed to prove my point. I'm not talking about people, like myself, who accept the fact that house prices rise or fall. I'm clearly talking about people who state on here that they WANT house prices to fall. You're right, though they never state that they want THEIR house prices to fall, just other people's! :rotfl:

Which are you Graham? Do you WANT house prices to fall or do you ACCEPT house prices may fall?