📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Children's shoes con

Options
12346»

Comments

  • My 3 kids all had their feet measured regularly and all had to have Startrite (I did too so it's my fault!) i'm glad I did though....

    At about 15 they just begged to be able to get their own shoes - and the bank manager was a bit happier too - youngest wore M&S school shoes for the last 3 years of uniform - bought on 3 for the price of 2 - it was about £30 for 3 pairs - she's still wearing the last pair at 18 and in the 6th form!

    I found a shoe shop I liked where I trusted the staff ( all mature and bee there for years) and I got good service. Thankfully the kids feet seem OK.
    :jFlylady and proud of it:j
  • Nara
    Nara Posts: 533 Forumite
    I get my DD's feet measured at Clarke's then go onto Ebay and buy Clarke's shoes in that size for a fiver :-)
  • My daughter nicks my shoes anyway, as we're both a 7.
    I HAD umpteen pairs of shoes. I don't now as she's worn them to her dad's and "will bring them back" :(

    I did hear once (no idea if it's true) that for younger children, it's best to get the cheapie shoes from the shops and not Clark's as some parents say "you have to get the wear out of them they cost £xx" whereas if you only pay £7 (for example) you're more likely to buy a new pair that fits and so will do less damage to growing feet.
    :hello:

    Engaged to the best man in the world :smileyhea
    Getting married 28th June 2013 :happyhear:love:
  • jellyhead
    jellyhead Posts: 21,555 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Are there really parents who would really make a child wear shoes that were too small simply to 'get the wear out of them'? Surely not!
    52% tight
  • Bella56
    Bella56 Posts: 215 Forumite
    jellyhead wrote: »
    Are there really parents who would really make a child wear shoes that were too small simply to 'get the wear out of them'? Surely not!
    I once heard a posh mum at the park bragging to her friends that she'd got her son's shoes in the sale, that she'd had to force his feet in and they were technically too small but would work for the summer...despite these mums wearing gucci sunglasses they thought that was really clever, getting expensive shoes for cheaper, nevermind the actual fit for the child :(
    Debts 2004: £6000..............................................Aug 2007: £0!!!!
  • fluffnutter
    fluffnutter Posts: 23,179 Forumite
    Sure, kids' shoes are expensive but then good shoes should be. Children only need one or two pairs though; just buy the best you can afford and wear them until they're too small. Who cares what they look like? I reckon you could get away with paying less than a hundred quid a year. I pay that for a single pair for myself (and I've got more than one or two ;):D)
    "Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.
  • jellyhead
    jellyhead Posts: 21,555 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Sure, kids' shoes are expensive but then good shoes should be. Children only need one or two pairs though; just buy the best you can afford and wear them until they're too small. Who cares what they look like? I reckon you could get away with paying less than a hundred quid a year. I pay that for a single pair for myself (and I've got more than one or two ;):D)

    I don't buy more shoes than necessary but it probably cost a bit more than a hundred for youngest because he still needs 2 or 3 pairs of school shoes per year (he's a giant and he grows fast - it used to be 4 pairs per year).

    3 pairs of school shoes would be around £110. His plimsolls for school are from Clarks, around £11 but they have lasted a year, thankfully. His clarks sandals were bought in the half price sale so they were only £15 but the pair before that were £30.

    Then they need a pair of wellies, and most kids have a pair of trainers.
    52% tight
  • jellyhead wrote: »
    I don't buy more shoes than necessary but it probably cost a bit more than a hundred for youngest because he still needs 2 or 3 pairs of school shoes per year (he's a giant and he grows fast - it used to be 4 pairs per year).

    3 pairs of school shoes would be around £110. His plimsolls for school are from Clarks, around £11 but they have lasted a year, thankfully. His clarks sandals were bought in the half price sale so they were only £15 but the pair before that were £30.

    Then they need a pair of wellies, and most kids have a pair of trainers.

    Or at least 3 pairs (as required by school) if they live here!

    Youngest also has funky trainers for out of school. They don't always have wellies though. If they have a pair of walking boots or snow boots that fit (if we've been on a walking/snow holiday for example), I won't buy wellies too, unless they're mandatory for a school trip.

    It's therefore obvious that I also spend more than £100/year on shoes for both my children, but I probably didn't before they started school, when they had no need for multiple pairs. I can also remember back to one pair of shoes being the norm, when I was a child.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.