We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

how to get rid of your savings so you can get council tax benifits

1356710

Comments

  • WestonDave
    WestonDave Posts: 5,154 Forumite
    Rampant Recycler
    If you lose the money, its gone - that is different to simply stashing it with family members because in effect you are having your cake and eating it - you get the benefits but you also get to get the benefit of the savings albeit at a distance within the family.
    Adventure before Dementia!
  • I think that's a bit different. Going to Vegas, betting on a three-legged horse, those kind of things, are not deliberately getting rid of your savings in order to claim a benefit. Losing money in a casino or on the race-track are not the same as giving money to relatives - you place bets hoping to win, don't you, you don't deliberately chuck your money away.
    .

    Supposing your son were the bookie... Couldn't you gamble your money and transfer it to relatives at the same time?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,033 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Just seems pointless working all your life to have savings and then having to spend it on your household bills and food because her pention only covers the rent.

    What is the point of a rainy day savings if you dont spend them when you have a rainy day.

    No-one should be planning to live on benefits. You are effectively planning to be poor to breadline level if you do. Is that really what you are suggesting?
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • WestonDave wrote: »
    If you lose the money, its gone - that is different to simply stashing it with family members because in effect you are having your cake and eating it - you get the benefits but you also get to get the benefit of the savings albeit at a distance within the family.
    1. As already indicated by several posters, it's against the law to "stash it" with your relatives with the intention of claiming benefits (deprivation of assets - benefit fraud).

    2. If you give it to your relatives, you have no right to ask for it back, and they are under no obligation to return it. See my earlier post (#6).
    A bank is a place that will lend you money if you can prove you don't need it.
  • noh
    noh Posts: 5,817 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think that's a bit different. Going to Vegas, betting on a three-legged horse, those kind of things, are not deliberately getting rid of your savings in order to claim a benefit. Losing money in a casino or on the race-track are not the same as giving money to relatives - you place bets hoping to win, don't you, you don't deliberately chuck your money away.

    I'm this sort of age-group and I'm still building up my savings/investments. Am fascinated and amazed by the process and wonder where my savings will go to in 10 years' time? I'd like to be around a lot longer just to see it.

    Gambling away the money certainly may be considered deliberate deprivation of capital if the intention was to reduce assets to a level where the claimant became eligible for benefit.

    See DWP guidance on assesment of capital.

    http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/hbgm-bw1-assessment-of-capital.pdf


    "W1.714 The following are further examples of when a person may have deprived themselves of
    capital
    • a lump sum payment has been made to someone else, for example as a gift, or to repay a
    debt, but see Reason for disposing of capital asset later in this chapter
    • substantial expenditure has been incurred on a non-essential item, for example on an
    expensive holiday
    • title deeds of a property, which is not the claimant’s home or will soon cease to be so
    because, for example, they will be moving elsewhere, have been transferred to someone
    else
    • money has been put into a trust which cannot be revoked
    • money has been converted into another form which would fall to be disregarded, for
    example personal possessions
    • capital has been reduced by extravagant living, for example gambling, or used to provide
    a much higher standard of living than the claimant usually maintained"
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    dunstonh wrote: »
    What is the point of a rainy day savings if you don't spend them when you have a rainy day.

    No-one should be planning to live on benefits. You are effectively planning to be poor to breadline level if you do. Is that really what you are suggesting?

    I completely agree. OH and I have been poor at certain times in our lives, we don't want to go there again, it's not a nice place to be.

    BTW my eldest GD lives in a council flat, and I'm certain that there are people around her who live on benefits. I've not heard any suggestion that she shouldn't be paying her own rent and council tax, though. Having been homeless, I think she's happy to do just that.
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
  • tescobabe69
    tescobabe69 Posts: 7,504 Forumite
    I regularly take my mother to the casino, she almost always "loses" I almost always "win", she buys her chips with a cheque, I bring home my winnings in cash.





    I dont, but I know someone who did.
  • Probably the wrong question to ask, but how could this be traced? eg if you had £17000 in savings and withdrew £1500 in cash and "gave" it to a family member would anyone be able to prove wrongdoing?
  • atush wrote: »
    No, but it would be she, not the OP who would have to travel and gamble. She can spend her money, but not give it away. She may well live and long life and need that savings to live one- better she has it than not.

    There is a 10.7 mil lottery winner on benefits as we speak, and he gets them as he spent the lot (and is a convicted criminal to boot). Love to see a law that said any person convicted of a crime who wins the lottery should have to pay a windfall to victims/the state.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jan/04/lotto-rapist-shirley-woodman-iorworth-hoare
  • sorcerer
    sorcerer Posts: 878 Forumite
    Probably the wrong question to ask, but how could this be traced? eg if you had £17000 in savings and withdrew £1500 in cash and "gave" it to a family member would anyone be able to prove wrongdoing?

    You would have to prove what you have done with the money.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.