We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
how to get rid of your savings so you can get council tax benifits
Comments
-
Certainly is,we're back to the MPs again.0
-
But they will not be 'On the make'
Fraud is fraud.
Please don't assume everyone sinks to the levels you're referring to.
Oh please - get off that high horse.
Ever parked on a double yellow line?"I don't mind if a chap talks rot. But I really must draw the line at utter rot." - PG Wodehouse0 -
Oh please - get off that high horse.
Ever parked on a double yellow line?
No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry, I'm one of those annoyingly honest people.An item I ordered from Play.com was delivered on one day with the same item being delivered again the following day.
I didn't hesitate to email them and inform them of the second delivery.
If a shop assistant gives me too much change, my automatic response it to tell them. I never even think of doing anything other than this.0 -
Yes of course -- civil servants are no longer going to creatively underspend in order to make a profit. However, if there is no incentive for them to take the bus and claim the standard train fare (pocketing the difference) then they may as well just take the train in any case and enjoy the greater comfort and convenience. The taxpayer is still stumping up the cost of the train fare whether or not the underling is going by train or bus. So no money is saved.
In that case civil servants should just be paid the bus fare!!
If the bus is good enough for taxpayers, why is it not good enough for their servants!!“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair0 -
Glen_Clark wrote: »If the bus is good enough for taxpayers, why is it not good enough for their servants!!
"If the bus is good enough..."
--- sure. But for most 'taxpayers' (and of course civil servants are tax payers -- but that's an aside), the bus isn't really good enough for long work journeys.
I needed an incentive to undertake the extra 3 hours or so journey time, and the extra discomfort, and the 5 a.m. starts.
But when you are broke, and when you are at that stage in your career when you haven't quite washed away the student mindset, then a couple of hours of free beer is just that incentive you need.
I wouldn't do it now. In my current (private sector) job I could employ a similar dodge by quietly downgrading, but I'm entitled to fly business class, and I always do because it gives me the rare chance to drink bucketloads of Cru Classe claret.
That'll do me."I don't mind if a chap talks rot. But I really must draw the line at utter rot." - PG Wodehouse0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards